Compare StocksGOOGL vs WY

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
$23.99

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
WY
  • Insiders have bought $0.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
  • PEG ratio of 0.44 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
WY
  • ROIC has declined by 13.1 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 14.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Weyerhaeuser Company scores only 19/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
WY
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$-45.88M
1.57%
FCF Yield
-0.27%
29.42
Trailing P/E
42.84
27.06
Forward P/E
34.64
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
3.27%
27.61%
ROE
3.43%
60.37%
Gross Margin
14.67%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.44
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.58
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.38
0.22%
Dividend Yield
3.50%
GOOGL: 10Ties: 1WY: 1
GOOGLWY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

WY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WY
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-947.0M
Δ Market Cap
$-5.65B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WY
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $23.99
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

WY

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WY
19/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WY
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WY
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,222
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WY
2
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $822,766
O'ROURKE JAMES CALVIN
Director
$101,400
@ $25.35 · 2026-02-20
BECKWITT RICHARD
Director
$514,000
@ $25.70 · 2026-02-19
LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
Director
$106,226
@ $23.61 · 2025-12-17
LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
Director
$101,140
@ $25.29 · 2025-08-11
O'ROURKE JAMES CALVIN
Director
$249,676
@ $32.01 · 2024-09-13
MONACO ALBERT
Director
$988,376
@ $31.38 · 2024-08-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WY
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.39M
CHANEY BRIAN K
Officer
$288,037
@ $25.82 · 2026-02-03
STOCKFISH DEVIN W
Chief Executive Officer
$2.10M
@ $23.33 · 2025-12-15
WILLIAMS KIM
Director
$369,252
@ $30.77 · 2024-08-27
PIASECKI NICOLE WEYERHAEUSER
Director
$169,814
@ $29.40 · 2024-06-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
WY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView WY Full Analysis
GOOGL vs WY: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io