Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs WMB

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. WMB is overvalued at $74, with an intrinsic value of $18 and a margin of safety of -306%. Of the two, WMB has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
$74.35

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
WMB
  • ★Gross margin of 63.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
    WMB
    • ⚠Trailing P/E of 29.6x is 31% above the historical average of 22.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.14 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠High leverage (1.99x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    WMB
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.52B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    -1.67%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    29.62
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    28.42
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    8.34%
    44.29%
    ROE
    21.50%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    63.64%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    2.14
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.99
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.35
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.82%
    GOOGL: 9Ties: 2WMB: 1
    GOOGLWMB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    WMB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    WMB
    $30.77
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.08B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$33.38B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    WMB
    240.5% Overvalued
    Price is 240.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $74.35
    Fair Value: $21.83
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    WMB

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    WMB
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    WMB
    -2.75
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    WMB
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 91.8%Retail & Other 7.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,346
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    WMB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    WMB
    2
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.99M
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $151,120
    @ $75.56 · 2026-09-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $973,317
    @ $74.87 · 2026-08-14
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $141,300
    @ $70.65 · 2026-08-03
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $148,320
    @ $74.16 · 2026-07-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $142,600
    @ $71.30 · 2026-06-01
    JASEK GLEN G
    Officer
    $195,383
    @ $78.15 · 2026-05-15
    LARSEN LARRY C
    Chief Operating Officer
    $917,820
    @ $76.48 · 2026-05-14
    PORTER JOHN DEAN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.77M
    @ $75.37 · 2026-05-06
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $152,700
    @ $76.35 · 2026-05-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $143,500
    @ $71.75 · 2026-04-01
    FAZEL PAYVAND
    Officer
    $211,989
    @ $73.15 · 2026-03-13
    RINKE TODD J
    Officer
    $547,808
    @ $74.39 · 2026-03-11
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $150,480
    @ $75.24 · 2026-03-02
    HAUSMAN MARY A.
    Officer
    $757,115
    @ $74.91 · 2026-02-26
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $1.97M
    @ $72.92 · 2026-02-24
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $132,780
    @ $66.39 · 2026-02-02
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $120,220
    @ $60.11 · 2026-01-02
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $123,800
    @ $61.90 · 2025-12-09
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $242,120
    @ $60.53 · 2025-11-12
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $115,240
    @ $57.62 · 2025-09-04
    LARSEN LARRY C
    Chief Operating Officer
    $263,115
    @ $58.47 · 2025-08-11
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $119,360
    @ $59.68 · 2025-08-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $125,400
    @ $62.70 · 2025-07-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $122,420
    @ $61.21 · 2025-06-02
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $116,420
    @ $58.21 · 2025-05-01
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $119,060
    @ $59.53 · 2025-04-01
    LARSEN LARRY C
    Officer
    $455,520
    @ $56.94 · 2025-03-12
    DUNN MICHEAL G
    Chief Operating Officer
    $5.13M
    @ $53.04 · 2025-03-07
    HAUSMAN MARY A.
    Officer
    $511,520
    @ $57.50 · 2025-03-04
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $116,980
    @ $58.49 · 2025-03-03
    TEPLY CHAD A
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $56.46 · 2025-02-27
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $109,840
    @ $54.92 · 2025-02-03
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $109,000
    @ $54.50 · 2025-01-02
    WILSON TERRANCE LANE
    General Counsel
    $117,200
    @ $58.60 · 2024-12-02
    HAUSMAN MARY A.
    Officer
    $447,650
    @ $56.30 · 2024-11-08
    LARSEN LARRY C
    Officer
    $377,512
    @ $56.48 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    WMB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    WMB
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView WMB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs WMB

    Is Alphabet Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, WMB trades at a -305.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $18 vs. price $74), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while WMB scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Williams Companies, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    WMB's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?▼

    Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a -0.0% free cash flow yield, compared to The Williams Companies, Inc.'s -1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or The Williams Companies, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus WMB's 8.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or The Williams Companies, Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to WMB's 34/100 (Unsafe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs WMB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io