Compare StocksGOOGL vs WDC

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Western Digital Corporation (WDC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. WDC is overvalued at $746, with an intrinsic value of $423 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, WDC has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
$746.23

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
WDC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.61 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 5.53 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
WDC
  • Share count has increased by 10% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
WDC
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$2.08B
1.63%
FCF Yield
0.81%
28.09
Trailing P/E
44.71
25.39
Forward P/E
41.33
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
30.19%
38.88%
ROE
85.92%
60.37%
Gross Margin
45.43%
1.47
PEG Ratio
0.61
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.39
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.06%
GOOGL: 6Ties: 1WDC: 5
GOOGLWDC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WDC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WDC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-665.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$52.27B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WDC
76.4% Overvalued
Price is 76.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $746.23
Fair Value: $423.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

WDC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $746?

+34.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +32.9%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WDC
30/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WDC

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WDC
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 101.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,963
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WDC
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WDC
11
Sells (3M)
36
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.48M
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.68M
@ $511.16 · 2026-06-09
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$385,924
@ $536.01 · 2026-06-09
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$235,699
@ $545.60 · 2026-06-05
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.38M
@ $556.24 · 2026-06-01
KIDDOO BRUCE E
Director
$396,390
@ $528.52 · 2026-05-28
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$265,973
@ $509.53 · 2026-05-27
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$48,640
@ $458.87 · 2026-05-21
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$5.01M
@ $500.69 · 2026-05-11
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.07M
@ $443.19 · 2026-05-04
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$8.24M
@ $411.84 · 2026-05-01
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$136,884
@ $377.09 · 2026-04-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.17M
@ $255.32 · 2026-03-06
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$2.74M
@ $270.31 · 2026-03-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$2.50M
@ $268.27 · 2026-03-04
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.63M
@ $271.67 · 2026-03-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$61,228
@ $286.11 · 2026-02-26
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$123,662
@ $282.33 · 2026-02-24
DAVIS BRIAN SCOTT
Officer
$2.79M
@ $279.16 · 2026-02-17
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.83M
@ $270.49 · 2026-02-06
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$5.11M
@ $255.44 · 2026-02-02
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$102,363
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-21
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$3.72M
@ $163.16 · 2025-12-05
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$320,165
@ $160.08 · 2025-12-04
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$449,752
@ $160.57 · 2025-12-02
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$975,696
@ $162.62 · 2025-12-01
OULMAN ROXANNE M
Director
$277,956
@ $154.42 · 2025-11-25
ALEXY KIMBERLY E.
Director
$272,272
@ $154.00 · 2025-11-25
COLE MARTIN I
Director
$1.61M
@ $161.32 · 2025-11-05
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$3.01M
@ $150.69 · 2025-11-03
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$1.02M
@ $90.29 · 2025-09-04
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$28,558
@ $80.90 · 2025-08-28
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$64,387
@ $79.10 · 2025-08-26
TREGILLIS CYNTHIA LOCK
Officer
$1.05M
@ $74.78 · 2025-08-22
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$375,847
@ $75.35 · 2025-08-22
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$654,334
@ $75.90 · 2025-08-19
GUBBI VIDYADHARA K
Officer
$722,359
@ $75.69 · 2025-08-13
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$14,212
@ $58.01 · 2025-06-17
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$94,888
@ $54.88 · 2025-06-05
TAN IRVING
Chief Executive Officer
$548,354
@ $48.19 · 2025-05-13
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$19,777
@ $43.37 · 2025-03-12
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$68,616
@ $41.36 · 2025-03-07
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$22,733
@ $72.63 · 2024-11-29
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$46,053
@ $69.99 · 2024-11-26
ZAMISKA GENE M
Officer
$24,241
@ $64.47 · 2024-11-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WDC
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
WDC
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView WDC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs WDC

Is Alphabet Inc. or Western Digital Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, WDC trades at a -76.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $423 vs. price $746), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while WDC scores 30/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. WDC scores 5.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Western Digital Corporation's 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Western Digital Corporation?

WDC earns 30.2% ROIC versus GOOGL's 21.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Western Digital Corporation's?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to WDC's 85/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.