Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs TTWO

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. TTWO is undervalued at $190, with an intrinsic value of $326 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, TTWO has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$190.17

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TTWO

    Risks

    GOOGL
      TTWO
      • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.61 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
      • ⚠6 insider sales totaling $2.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      TTWO
      Valuation
      $-1.16B
      Free Cash Flow
      $1.26B
      -0.03%
      FCF Yield
      3.53%
      14.61
      Trailing P/E
      N/A
      18.49
      Forward P/E
      18.50
      Quality & Moat
      14.30%
      ROIC
      0.42%
      44.29%
      ROE
      -9.04%
      60.86%
      Gross Margin
      57.13%
      0.98
      PEG Ratio
      2.61
      Balance Sheet Safety
      Net cash
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.31
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      -0.62
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      1.46
      0.31%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      GOOGL: 7Ties: 2TTWO: 2
      GOOGLTTWO

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      GOOGL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      TTWO
      No data available for this metric.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      $9.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $288.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$2.65T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      TTWO
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-8.52B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$8.07B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      3447.8% Overvalued
      Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $279.84
      Fair Value: $7.89
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      TTWO
      41.6% Margin of Safety
      Price is 41.6% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $190.17
      Fair Value: $325.90
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      GOOGL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      TTWO

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $190?

      +18.7%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +12.8%

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      89/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      TTWO
      39/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      -2.92
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      TTWO

      Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders7,451
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      TTWO
      Insiders 1.8%Institutions 100.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,554
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      TTWO
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      No open market insider sales found.
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      TTWO
      6
      Sells (3M)
      25
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $15.17M
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $98,586
      @ $203.69 · 2026-10-02
      GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
      Director
      $2.02M
      @ $202.39 · 2026-09-29
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $361,055
      @ $217.37 · 2026-09-03
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $290,563
      @ $217.65 · 2026-09-02
      SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
      Director
      $88,694
      @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $31,116
      @ $245.01 · 2026-08-17
      MOSES JON J
      Director
      $122,305
      @ $244.61 · 2026-06-22
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $1.02M
      @ $230.00 · 2026-06-16
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $950,515
      @ $215.00 · 2026-06-15
      MOSES JON J
      Director
      $107,608
      @ $215.22 · 2026-06-15
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $1.89M
      @ $214.00 · 2026-06-08
      DORNEMANN MICHAEL
      Director
      $249,790
      @ $217.02 · 2026-06-04
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $4.63M
      @ $219.61 · 2026-06-02
      SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
      Director
      $85,548
      @ $229.35 · 2026-06-01
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $28,592
      @ $218.26 · 2026-05-29
      GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
      Director
      $521,725
      @ $208.69 · 2026-03-09
      DORNEMANN MICHAEL
      Director
      $296,195
      @ $213.09 · 2026-03-05
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $248,906
      @ $213.47 · 2026-03-02
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $535,637
      @ $213.57 · 2026-03-02
      GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
      Director
      $522,525
      @ $209.01 · 2026-03-02
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $30,183
      @ $194.73 · 2026-02-18
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $399,953
      @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $274,658
      @ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
      SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
      Director
      $321,664
      @ $238.27 · 2025-11-18
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $42,790
      @ $235.11 · 2025-11-17
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.50M
      @ $250.00 · 2025-09-08
      MOSES JON J
      Director
      $239,570
      @ $239.57 · 2025-09-04
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $474,110
      @ $238.73 · 2025-09-03
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.77M
      @ $239.57 · 2025-09-02
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $4.61M
      @ $230.64 · 2025-08-28
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $5.11M
      @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
      SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
      Director
      $528,868
      @ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
      SLATOFF KARL
      President
      $11.16M
      @ $227.68 · 2025-08-21
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $46,227
      @ $233.47 · 2025-08-18
      MOSES JON J
      Director
      $231,330
      @ $231.33 · 2025-08-15
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $8.95M
      @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $6.09M
      @ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $45,106
      @ $225.53 · 2025-06-02
      SHERESKY MICHAEL J
      Director
      $37,057
      @ $214.20 · 2025-03-06
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $175,118
      @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $121,885
      @ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
      SLATOFF KARL
      President
      $7.02M
      @ $208.13 · 2025-02-25
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $262,197
      @ $187.95 · 2024-12-03
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $212,221
      @ $187.64 · 2024-12-02
      EMERSON DANIEL P
      Officer
      $818,545
      @ $176.79 · 2024-11-08
      SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
      Director
      $358,340
      @ $179.17 · 2024-11-08
      GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
      Chief Financial Officer
      $8.76M
      @ $175.05 · 2024-11-08
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(23/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      TTWO
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(32/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
      TTWO
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
      View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TTWO Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TTWO

      Is Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTWO trades at a 41.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $326 vs. price $190), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

      GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while TTWO scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

      GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTWO scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

      Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) generates a 3.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?▼

      GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus TTWO's 0.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      GOOGL vs TTWO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io