Compare StocksGOOGL vs TTWO

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. TTWO is undervalued at $239, with an intrinsic value of $329 and a margin of safety of 27%. Of the two, TTWO has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
$239.28

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TTWO
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.18 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TTWO
  • PEG ratio of 3.21 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $7.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
TTWO
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.45B
1.63%
FCF Yield
3.26%
28.09
Trailing P/E
N/A
25.39
Forward P/E
23.72
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
1.89%
38.88%
ROE
-10.56%
60.37%
Gross Margin
57.67%
1.47
PEG Ratio
3.21
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.23
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 2TTWO: 2
GOOGLTTWO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TTWO
No data available for this metric.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TTWO
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-8.52B
Δ Market Cap
+$17.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TTWO
27.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 27.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $239.28
Fair Value: $329.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TTWO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $239?

+21.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.8%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TTWO
39/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TTWO

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TTWO
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 93.9%Retail & Other 4.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,491
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TTWO
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TTWO
6
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $38.71M
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$950,515
@ $215.00 · 2026-06-15
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$1.89M
@ $214.00 · 2026-06-08
DORNEMANN MICHAEL
Director
$249,790
@ $217.02 · 2026-06-04
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$4.63M
@ $219.61 · 2026-06-02
SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
Director
$85,548
@ $229.35 · 2026-06-01
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$28,592
@ $218.26 · 2026-05-29
GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
Director
$521,725
@ $208.69 · 2026-03-09
DORNEMANN MICHAEL
Director
$296,195
@ $213.09 · 2026-03-05
GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAM
Director
$522,525
@ $209.01 · 2026-03-02
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$248,906
@ $213.47 · 2026-03-02
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$535,637
@ $213.57 · 2026-03-02
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$30,183
@ $194.73 · 2026-02-18
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$399,953
@ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$274,658
@ $248.11 · 2025-12-02
SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
Director
$321,664
@ $238.27 · 2025-11-18
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$42,790
@ $235.11 · 2025-11-17
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.50M
@ $250.00 · 2025-09-08
MOSES JON J
Director
$239,570
@ $239.57 · 2025-09-04
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$474,110
@ $238.73 · 2025-09-03
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.77M
@ $239.57 · 2025-09-02
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$4.61M
@ $230.64 · 2025-08-28
SLATOFF KARL
President
$11.16M
@ $227.68 · 2025-08-21
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$5.11M
@ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
Director
$528,868
@ $227.47 · 2025-08-21
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$46,227
@ $233.47 · 2025-08-18
MOSES JON J
Director
$231,330
@ $231.33 · 2025-08-15
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$8.95M
@ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$6.09M
@ $225.22 · 2025-06-02
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$45,106
@ $225.53 · 2025-06-02
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$37,057
@ $214.20 · 2025-03-06
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$175,118
@ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$121,885
@ $211.24 · 2025-03-03
SLATOFF KARL
President
$7.02M
@ $208.13 · 2025-02-25
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$262,197
@ $187.95 · 2024-12-03
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$212,221
@ $187.64 · 2024-12-02
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$8.76M
@ $175.05 · 2024-11-08
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$818,545
@ $176.79 · 2024-11-08
SRINIVASAN LAVERNE EVANS
Director
$358,340
@ $179.17 · 2024-11-08
GOLDSTEIN LAINIE
Chief Financial Officer
$182,177
@ $158.14 · 2024-09-03
EMERSON DANIEL P
Officer
$124,931
@ $158.14 · 2024-09-03
SHERESKY MICHAEL J
Director
$28,618
@ $149.83 · 2024-08-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TTWO
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
TTWO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TTWO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TTWO

Is Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TTWO trades at a 27.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $329 vs. price $239), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while TTWO scores 39/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TTWO scores 4.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) generates a 3.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus TTWO's 1.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.