Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs TRMB

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Trimble Inc. (TRMB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. TRMB is fairly valued at $65, with an intrinsic value of $68 and a margin of safety of 5%. Of the two, TRMB has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
TRMB
Trimble Inc.
$64.94

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TRMB
  • ★Gross margin of 71.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.32 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
    TRMB
    • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.10 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • ⚠14 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    TRMB
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $686.17M
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    4.53%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    15.70
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    6.88%
    44.29%
    ROE
    -1.94%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    71.77%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.53
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.24
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.41
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 1TRMB: 4
    GOOGLTRMB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TRMB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TRMB
    $2.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.24B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.01B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TRMB
    4.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 4.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $64.94
    Fair Value: $68.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TRMB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $65?

    +12.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.1%

    The market implies +12.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +10.1%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TRMB
    53/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TRMB
    -2.29
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TRMB
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 102.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,066
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TRMB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TRMB
    0
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.31M
    GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
    Director
    $103,080
    @ $60.00 · 2026-08-04
    SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $67.01 · 2026-04-16
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $502,050
    @ $66.94 · 2026-04-14
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $528,375
    @ $70.45 · 2026-03-10
    DALTON JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $49,126
    @ $67.02 · 2026-02-27
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $488,550
    @ $65.14 · 2026-02-10
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $606,600
    @ $80.88 · 2026-01-13
    SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $181,012
    @ $80.45 · 2025-12-16
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $610,425
    @ $81.39 · 2025-12-09
    DALTON JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $50,506
    @ $81.99 · 2025-11-28
    BISIO RONALD
    Officer
    $202,175
    @ $80.87 · 2025-11-26
    SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
    Officer
    $128,460
    @ $76.83 · 2025-11-17
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $596,250
    @ $79.50 · 2025-11-11
    GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
    Director
    $139,158
    @ $81.00 · 2025-11-06
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,375
    @ $75.65 · 2025-10-14
    KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
    Officer
    $602,015
    @ $81.74 · 2025-09-18
    SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
    Chief Financial Officer
    $182,948
    @ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $609,825
    @ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
    DALTON JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $50,188
    @ $82.41 · 2025-08-28
    LARGE PETER
    Officer
    $218,228
    @ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
    BISIO RONALD
    Officer
    $203,875
    @ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $621,975
    @ $82.93 · 2025-08-12
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.46M
    @ $83.59 · 2025-08-11
    ALLISON JENNIFER
    General Counsel
    $252,480
    @ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
    SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
    Officer
    $112,320
    @ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $591,450
    @ $78.86 · 2025-07-08
    SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
    Officer
    $115,128
    @ $78.00 · 2025-07-03
    BISIO RONALD
    Officer
    $187,500
    @ $75.00 · 2025-06-26
    BISIO RONALD
    Officer
    $109,125
    @ $72.75 · 2025-06-16
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,525
    @ $72.47 · 2025-06-10
    GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
    Director
    $425,853
    @ $70.94 · 2025-06-02
    DALTON JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $50,112
    @ $72.00 · 2025-05-28
    PAINTER ROBERT G
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,475
    @ $71.53 · 2025-05-27
    GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
    Director
    $466,774
    @ $71.69 · 2025-05-21
    LARGE PETER
    Officer
    $77,879
    @ $70.80 · 2025-05-12
    LARGE PETER
    Officer
    $126,436
    @ $66.55 · 2025-05-08
    KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
    Officer
    $411,036
    @ $72.00 · 2025-02-25
    DALTON JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $153,702
    @ $71.79 · 2025-02-24
    ALLISON JENNIFER
    General Counsel
    $266,934
    @ $74.75 · 2025-01-17
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TRMB
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    TRMB
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TRMB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TRMB

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Trimble Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TRMB trades at a 4.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $68 vs. price $65), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Trimble Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while TRMB scores 53/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TRMB scores 4.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Trimble Inc.?▼

    Trimble Inc. (TRMB) generates a 4.5% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Trimble Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus TRMB's 6.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    GOOGL vs TRMB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io