Compare StocksGOOGL vs TRMB

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Trimble Inc. (TRMB)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13
VS
TRMB
Trimble Inc.
$66.68

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
TRMB
  • Gross margin of 71.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.68 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.47 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TRMB
  • 33 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
TRMB
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$522.81M
1.97%
FCF Yield
3.30%
28.41
Trailing P/E
37.89
22.88
Forward P/E
16.49
Quality & Moat
20.83%
ROIC
8.62%
31.83%
ROE
7.27%
59.65%
Gross Margin
71.08%
0.91
PEG Ratio
0.47
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Debt / Equity
0.27
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.60
0.27%
Dividend Yield
N/A
GOOGL: 6Ties: 1TRMB: 4
GOOGLTRMB

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

TRMB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TRMB
$2.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$6.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TRMB
35.0% Overvalued
Price is 35.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $66.68
Fair Value: $49.40
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TRMB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $67?

+17.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.4%

The market implies +17.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TRMB
53/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TRMB
-2.29
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TRMB
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 100.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,152
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TRMB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TRMB
4
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.69M
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$528,375
@ $70.45 · 2026-03-10
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$49,126
@ $67.02 · 2026-02-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$488,550
@ $65.14 · 2026-02-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$606,600
@ $80.88 · 2026-01-13
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$181,012
@ $80.45 · 2025-12-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$610,425
@ $81.39 · 2025-12-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,506
@ $81.99 · 2025-11-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$202,175
@ $80.87 · 2025-11-26
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$128,460
@ $76.83 · 2025-11-17
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$596,250
@ $79.50 · 2025-11-11
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$139,158
@ $81.00 · 2025-11-06
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$567,375
@ $75.65 · 2025-10-14
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$602,015
@ $81.74 · 2025-09-18
SAWARYNSKI PHILLIP
Chief Financial Officer
$182,948
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$609,825
@ $81.31 · 2025-09-09
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,188
@ $82.41 · 2025-08-28
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$203,875
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
LARGE PETER
Officer
$218,228
@ $81.55 · 2025-08-27
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$621,975
@ $82.93 · 2025-08-12
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.46M
@ $83.59 · 2025-08-11
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$112,320
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$252,480
@ $80.00 · 2025-07-10
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$591,450
@ $78.86 · 2025-07-08
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$115,128
@ $78.00 · 2025-07-03
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$187,500
@ $75.00 · 2025-06-26
BISIO RONALD
Officer
$109,125
@ $72.75 · 2025-06-16
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$543,525
@ $72.47 · 2025-06-10
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$425,853
@ $70.94 · 2025-06-02
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$50,112
@ $72.00 · 2025-05-28
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$536,475
@ $71.53 · 2025-05-27
GABRIEL KAIGHAM J.
Director
$466,774
@ $71.69 · 2025-05-21
LARGE PETER
Officer
$77,879
@ $70.80 · 2025-05-12
LARGE PETER
Officer
$126,436
@ $66.55 · 2025-05-08
KEATING CHRISTOPHER F
Officer
$411,036
@ $72.00 · 2025-02-25
DALTON JAMES CALVIN
Director
$153,702
@ $71.79 · 2025-02-24
ALLISON JENNIFER
General Counsel
$266,934
@ $74.75 · 2025-01-17
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$137,230
@ $59.10 · 2024-04-16
LARGE PETER
Officer
$85,518
@ $59.10 · 2024-04-16
SCHWARTZ MARK DAVID
Officer
$14,368
@ $61.14 · 2024-04-15
PAINTER ROBERT G
Chief Executive Officer
$218,750
@ $62.50 · 2024-04-09
LARGE PETER
Officer
$11,440
@ $65.00 · 2024-03-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TRMB
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
TRMB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TRMB Full Analysis