Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs TPR

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Tapestry, Inc. (TPR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. TPR is undervalued at $116, with an intrinsic value of $200 and a margin of safety of 42%. Of the two, TPR has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$116.29

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TPR
  • ★Gross margin of 76.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Tapestry, Inc. scores 77/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
    TPR
    • ⚠FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠High leverage (4.05x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $4.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    TPR
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.40B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    6.07%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    16.00
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    13.08
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    26.97%
    44.29%
    ROE
    197.13%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    76.59%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.66
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    4.05
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.39
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    1.59%
    GOOGL: 4Ties: 1TPR: 7
    GOOGLTPR

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TPR

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TPR
    $9.45
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.58B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$14.93B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TPR
    42.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 42.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $116.29
    Fair Value: $200.40
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TPR

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $116?

    +5.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.7%

    The market implies +5.0% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +6.7%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TPR
    77/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TPR
    -2.78
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TPR
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 103.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TPR
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TPR
    2
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $48.44M
    KULIKOWSKY DENISE
    Officer
    $670,329
    @ $115.38 · 2026-09-09
    CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.68M
    @ $132.47 · 2026-08-19
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $140.02 · 2026-05-26
    CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.69M
    @ $132.89 · 2026-05-13
    DADLANI MANESH
    Officer
    $152,149
    @ $156.05 · 2026-03-03
    CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.56M
    @ $154.87 · 2026-02-18
    GRECO THOMAS R
    Director
    $2.20M
    @ $154.44 · 2026-02-17
    DADLANI MANESH
    Officer
    $329,492
    @ $153.47 · 2026-02-11
    ROE SCOTT A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $6.76M
    @ $152.62 · 2026-02-10
    GATES ANNE
    Director
    $999,327
    @ $153.79 · 2026-02-10
    KULIKOWSKY DENISE
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $155.62 · 2026-02-10
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $6.03M
    @ $151.34 · 2026-02-09
    KULIKOWSKY DENISE
    Officer
    $67,144
    @ $115.17 · 2025-12-04
    KULIKOWSKY DENISE
    Officer
    $184,133
    @ $110.19 · 2025-11-26
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $1.11M
    @ $107.00 · 2025-11-24
    ROE SCOTT A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $104.85 · 2025-11-21
    CREVOISERAT JOANNE C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.34M
    @ $105.31 · 2025-11-21
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $102.83 · 2025-11-18
    HOWARD DAVID E
    Officer
    $2.57M
    @ $102.50 · 2025-11-18
    LAU KA MING ALAN
    Director
    $1.20M
    @ $106.19 · 2025-09-11
    DADLANI MANESH
    Officer
    $780,712
    @ $99.05 · 2025-08-25
    DADLANI MANESH
    Officer
    $137,260
    @ $82.29 · 2025-05-13
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $3.26M
    @ $81.40 · 2025-05-12
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $84.71 · 2025-02-26
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $681,976
    @ $87.59 · 2025-02-21
    HOWARD DAVID E
    General Counsel
    $1.05M
    @ $88.00 · 2025-02-20
    ROE SCOTT A
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.23M
    @ $86.56 · 2025-02-20
    KAHN TODD LEONARD
    Officer
    $4.19M
    @ $58.68 · 2024-11-25
    HOWARD DAVID E
    General Counsel
    $2.48M
    @ $58.95 · 2024-11-22
    DADLANI MANESH
    Officer
    $514,219
    @ $57.96 · 2024-11-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TPR
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(38/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    TPR
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TPR Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TPR

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Tapestry, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TPR trades at a 42.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $200 vs. price $116), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while TPR scores 77/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TPR scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

    Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) generates a 6.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Tapestry, Inc.?▼

    TPR earns 27.0% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Tapestry, Inc.'s?▼

    TPR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). TPR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs TPR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io