Compare StocksGOOGL vs TMUS

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. TMUS is undervalued at $182, with an intrinsic value of $506 and a margin of safety of 64%. Of the two, TMUS has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
$181.67

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TMUS
  • Gross margin of 63.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.64 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
TMUS
  • FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.66 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
TMUS
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$15.43B
1.63%
FCF Yield
7.85%
28.09
Trailing P/E
19.33
25.39
Forward P/E
13.00
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
9.65%
38.88%
ROE
18.02%
60.37%
Gross Margin
63.28%
1.47
PEG Ratio
0.73
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
2.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.50
0.24%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
GOOGL: 5Ties: 2TMUS: 5
GOOGLTMUS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TMUS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TMUS
$2.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$52.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TMUS
64.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 64.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $181.67
Fair Value: $505.82
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

TMUS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $182?

+11.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.0%

The market implies +11.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TMUS
45/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TMUS
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TMUS
Insiders 55.1%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 1.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,350
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TMUS
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.98M
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Officer
$1.00M
@ $196.20 · 2026-05-01
GOPALAN SRINI
Chief Executive Officer
$1.98M
@ $201.82 · 2025-11-06
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$12,446
@ $188.58 · 2024-12-12
ALMEIDA ANDRE
Director
$897,528
@ $235.76 · 2024-12-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TMUS
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $140.39M
FREIER JON
Chief Operating Officer
$911,810
@ $190.00 · 2026-05-21
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$979,050
@ $195.81 · 2026-05-01
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$727,640
@ $221.10 · 2026-03-04
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$3.30M
@ $220.20 · 2026-02-24
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$517,968
@ $222.40 · 2026-02-24
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$17.20M
@ $214.94 · 2026-02-19
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$3.64M
@ $220.38 · 2026-02-18
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $214.86 · 2026-02-18
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$306,436
@ $210.32 · 2025-12-05
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Director
$9.70M
@ $215.61 · 2025-11-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$539,775
@ $215.91 · 2025-11-17
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$30.82M
@ $239.15 · 2025-09-16
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$11.54M
@ $256.38 · 2025-08-19
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$627,800
@ $251.12 · 2025-08-15
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.96M
@ $240.80 · 2025-07-29
FREIER JON
Officer
$1.75M
@ $250.00 · 2025-07-24
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$49.07M
@ $234.19 · 2025-06-30
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.92M
@ $242.69 · 2025-05-20
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$592,800
@ $237.12 · 2025-05-15
DATAR SRIKANT MADHAV
Director
$191,990
@ $263.00 · 2025-03-05
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$6.58M
@ $263.23 · 2025-02-27
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$12.01M
@ $266.82 · 2025-02-26
EWALDSSON ULF
Officer
$5.16M
@ $265.63 · 2025-02-21
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$7.91M
@ $262.66 · 2025-02-20
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.72M
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$525,400
@ $262.70 · 2025-02-19
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$2.76M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
FIELD CALLIE R
Officer
$2.49M
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
BAZZANO DARA A
Officer
$1.05M
@ $269.10 · 2025-02-18
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$675,000
@ $270.00 · 2025-02-18
TAYLOR TERESA A
Director
$1.89M
@ $235.65 · 2025-02-03
LONG LETITIA A
Director
$254,188
@ $231.08 · 2024-12-13
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.57M
@ $239.22 · 2024-11-14
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.51M
@ $237.78 · 2024-11-12
OSVALDIK PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.67M
@ $233.55 · 2024-10-25
NELSON MARK WOLFE
General Counsel
$9.25M
@ $216.26 · 2024-10-16
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$615,900
@ $205.30 · 2024-10-01
CANO NESTOR
Officer
$1.68M
@ $197.21 · 2024-08-19
SIEVERT G MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$7.79M
@ $194.81 · 2024-08-13
KING DEEANNE
Officer
$2.93M
@ $190.00 · 2024-08-08
FREIER JON
Officer
$1.82M
@ $181.87 · 2024-08-01
KATZ MICHAEL J
Officer
$532,770
@ $177.59 · 2024-07-01
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$70.71M
@ $176.60 · 2024-06-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TMUS
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
TMUS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TMUS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TMUS

Is Alphabet Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TMUS trades at a 64.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $506 vs. price $182), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while TMUS scores 45/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is T-Mobile US, Inc. in financial distress?

TMUS's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) generates a 7.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or T-Mobile US, Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus TMUS's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or T-Mobile US, Inc.'s?

TMUS's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). TMUS has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

GOOGL vs TMUS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io