Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs TDG

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. TDG is overvalued at $1147, with an intrinsic value of $990 and a margin of safety of -16%. Of the two, TDG has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
$1146.81

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
TDG
  • ★TransDigm Group Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★TransDigm Group Incorporated scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 29.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
    TDG
    • ⚠FCF yield of 2.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.05 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 6.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    TDG
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.46B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    2.30%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    34.78
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    23.58
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    10.86%
    44.29%
    ROE
    N/A
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    59.82%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    3.05
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    6.03
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 2TDG: 2
    GOOGLTDG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    TDG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    TDG
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-6.62B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$40.74B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    TDG
    15.8% Overvalued
    Price is 15.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1146.81
    Fair Value: $990.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    TDG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1147?

    +17.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +23.8%

    The market implies +17.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +23.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    TDG
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    TDG
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    TDG
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 97.5%Retail & Other 2.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,526
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    TDG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.84M
    SMALL ROBERT J
    Director
    $1,285
    @ $1285.00 · 2026-02-25
    LISMAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.22M
    @ $1284.26 · 2026-02-06
    LISMAN MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.62M
    @ $1339.14 · 2025-11-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    TDG
    2
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $61.69M
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.27M
    @ $1094.58 · 2026-09-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.83M
    @ $1238.76 · 2026-08-17
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.24M
    @ $1216.21 · 2026-07-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,678
    @ $1231.11 · 2026-07-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.98M
    @ $1276.78 · 2026-06-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.50M
    @ $1154.09 · 2026-05-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.99M
    @ $1280.46 · 2026-04-15
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.85M
    @ $1243.70 · 2026-03-16
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $5.05M
    @ $1293.88 · 2026-02-17
    MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $414,729
    @ $1430.10 · 2026-02-02
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $5.58M
    @ $1429.92 · 2026-01-15
    MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $385,419
    @ $1329.03 · 2026-01-02
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $5.03M
    @ $1290.52 · 2025-12-15
    SMALL ROBERT J
    Director
    $6.06M
    @ $1290.19 · 2025-12-10
    MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $391,807
    @ $1351.06 · 2025-12-01
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $5.23M
    @ $1340.00 · 2025-11-17
    MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $379,900
    @ $1310.00 · 2025-11-03
    MURPHY PATRICK JOSEPH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $785,761
    @ $1354.76 · 2025-10-27
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.84M
    @ $1279.59 · 2025-10-20
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $1276.07 · 2025-09-22
    GRAFF MICHAEL S
    Director
    $2.47M
    @ $1402.09 · 2025-08-26
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.22M
    @ $1406.07 · 2025-08-20
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.79M
    @ $1597.86 · 2025-07-21
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.27M
    @ $1424.27 · 2025-06-20
    WYNNE SARAH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.61M
    @ $1450.00 · 2025-06-13
    WYNNE SARAH
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.65M
    @ $1452.15 · 2025-06-12
    HENNESSY SEAN P
    Director
    $6.75M
    @ $1436.52 · 2025-05-20
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.30M
    @ $1434.35 · 2025-05-20
    WARREN JESSICA L
    General Counsel
    $698,250
    @ $1425.00 · 2025-05-13
    REISS JOEL
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $1321.80 · 2025-04-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    TDG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    TDG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView TDG Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs TDG

    Is Alphabet Inc. or TransDigm Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, TDG trades at a -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $990 vs. price $1147), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

    TDG scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is TransDigm Group Incorporated in financial distress?▼

    TDG's Altman Z-Score of 2.0 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

    TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) generates a 2.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or TransDigm Group Incorporated?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus TDG's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or TransDigm Group Incorporated's?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to TDG's 21/100 (Unsafe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs TDG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io