Compare StocksGOOGL vs SYK

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Stryker Corporation (SYK)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13
VS
SYK
Stryker Corporation
$339.76

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
SYK
  • Gross margin of 65.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Stryker Corporation scores 83/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 28.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
SYK

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    SYK
    Valuation
    $73.27B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.17B
    1.97%
    FCF Yield
    3.21%
    28.41
    Trailing P/E
    40.50
    22.88
    Forward P/E
    20.30
    Quality & Moat
    20.83%
    ROIC
    13.93%
    31.83%
    ROE
    14.48%
    59.65%
    Gross Margin
    65.04%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    0.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.16
    Debt / Equity
    0.73
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.76
    0.27%
    Dividend Yield
    1.04%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 1SYK: 5
    GOOGLSYK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    SYK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SYK
    $7.26
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $5.76B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$41.85B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    20.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $307.13
    Fair Value: $384.04
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SYK
    71.4% Overvalued
    Price is 71.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $339.76
    Fair Value: $198.26
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +20.2%

    The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    SYK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $340?

    +18.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.0%

    The market implies +18.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SYK
    83/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SYK
    -2.63
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,206
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SYK
    Insiders 5.4%Institutions 82.3%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,067
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SYK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SYK
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.33M
    PIERCE JAMES ANDREW
    Officer
    $175,215
    @ $368.87 · 2026-02-02
    WELLS PRESTON WENDELL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $60,370
    @ $365.88 · 2025-11-20
    BERRY WILLIAM E JR
    Officer
    $713,802
    @ $365.49 · 2025-11-14
    MENON VIJU S
    Officer
    $195,305
    @ $390.61 · 2025-08-25
    FLETCHER ROBERT S
    Officer
    $701,630
    @ $393.07 · 2025-08-20
    BERRY WILLIAM E JR
    Officer
    $482,202
    @ $388.56 · 2025-05-12
    GOLSTON ALLAN C
    Director
    $941,586
    @ $383.07 · 2025-02-18
    STILES SPENCER S
    Officer
    $201,056
    @ $391.16 · 2024-11-15
    LOBO KEVIN A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $21.13M
    @ $368.70 · 2024-11-07
    FINK MARY KATHRYN
    Officer
    $3.48M
    @ $367.65 · 2024-09-17
    MENON VIJU S
    Officer
    $213,000
    @ $355.00 · 2024-08-27
    BOEHNLEIN GLENN S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.66M
    @ $333.00 · 2024-08-02
    FLETCHER ROBERT S
    Officer
    $668,308
    @ $332.99 · 2024-05-22
    BOEHNLEIN GLENN S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $327.65 · 2024-05-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SYK
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(40/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    SYK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (40)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView SYK Full Analysis