SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs STZ

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13
VS
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$151.91

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
STZ
  • ★Constellation Brands, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Constellation Brands, Inc. scores 87/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Dividend yield of 2.69% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

GOOGL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
STZ
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
STZ
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.97B
1.97%
FCF Yield
7.45%
28.41
Trailing P/E
23.85
22.88
Forward P/E
12.28
Quality & Moat
20.83%
ROIC
13.47%
31.83%
ROE
-1.02%
59.65%
Gross Margin
52.14%
0.91
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Debt / Equity
1.33
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.96
0.27%
Dividend Yield
2.69%
GOOGL: 6Ties: 1STZ: 4
GOOGLSTZ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

STZ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STZ
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-398.3M
Δ Market Cap
$-19.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STZ
8.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 8.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.91
Fair Value: $166.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

STZ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+6.8%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STZ
87/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STZ
-3.41
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STZ
Insiders 19.9%Institutions 78.9%Retail & Other 1.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,411
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STZ
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $340,886
BALDWIN CHRISTOPHER J.
Director
$340,886
@ $170.44 · 2025-07-08
GILES WILLIAM T
Director
$186,390
@ $186.39 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STZ
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $817,995
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$85,345
@ $153.77 · 2026-02-17
BOURDEAU JAMES O
Officer
$138,749
@ $169.00 · 2025-07-21
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$593,901
@ $188.54 · 2025-05-13
SER BUSINESS HOLDINGS LP
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$159,060
@ $241.00 · 2024-11-20
SABIA JAMES ANTHONY JR.
President
$8.77M
@ $242.99 · 2024-11-14
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$6.09M
@ $243.58 · 2024-11-14
CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
Officer
$78,870
@ $239.00 · 2024-11-13
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.76M
@ $237.24 · 2024-10-29
GLAETZER SAMUEL J
Officer
$370,809
@ $245.57 · 2024-10-14
HANKINSON GARTH
Chief Financial Officer
$8.09M
@ $240.10 · 2024-08-09
MCCARTHY DANIEL J
Director
$468,009
@ $252.43 · 2024-07-26
CAREY KANEENAT KRISTANN
Officer
$254,997
@ $261.00 · 2024-07-12
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$6.54M
@ $261.54 · 2024-05-10
MCGREW MICHAEL
Officer
$827,043
@ $255.50 · 2024-05-03
NEWLANDS WILLIAM A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.06M
@ $263.25 · 2024-04-19
SABIA JAMES ANTHONY JR.
Officer
$4.16M
@ $263.63 · 2024-04-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STZ
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
STZ
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView STZ Full Analysis