Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs STE

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs STERIS plc (STE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. STE is overvalued at $227, with an intrinsic value of $186 and a margin of safety of -22%. Of the two, STE has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
STE
STERIS plc
$227.12

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
STE
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 35.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.76 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

GOOGL
    STE
    • ⚠8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    STE
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $798.86M
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    3.61%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    27.77
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    18.42
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    9.86%
    44.29%
    ROE
    11.39%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    44.42%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.76
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.22
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.95
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    1.22%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 2STE: 3
    GOOGLSTE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    STE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    STE
    $0.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $1.11B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$528.7M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    STE
    21.8% Overvalued
    Price is 21.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $227.12
    Fair Value: $186.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    STE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $227?

    +13.1%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    STE
    63/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    STE
    -2.67
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    STE
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,228
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    STE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    STE
    1
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.83M
    SOHI MOHSEN M
    Director
    $956,795
    @ $235.78 · 2026-08-12
    ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
    General Counsel
    $296,968
    @ $209.28 · 2026-06-15
    CARESTIO DANIEL A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $946,799
    @ $213.82 · 2026-06-05
    BREEDEN RICHARD C.
    Director
    $310,284
    @ $209.51 · 2026-06-02
    FELDMANN CYNTHIA L
    Director
    $734,877
    @ $237.21 · 2026-03-05
    MADSEN JULIA
    Officer
    $1.31M
    @ $262.00 · 2025-11-21
    TAMARO RENATO
    Officer and Treasurer
    $1.30M
    @ $257.55 · 2025-11-18
    ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
    General Counsel
    $3.98M
    @ $265.14 · 2025-11-11
    CARESTIO DANIEL A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38,449
    @ $241.82 · 2025-10-06
    TAMARO RENATO
    Officer and Treasurer
    $798,565
    @ $249.24 · 2025-08-20
    BURTON KAREN L
    Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $241.73 · 2025-08-11
    SOHI MOHSEN M
    Director
    $994,456
    @ $241.96 · 2025-08-11
    FELDMANN CYNTHIA L
    Director
    $844,252
    @ $241.56 · 2025-08-11
    ZANGERLE JOHN ADAM
    General Counsel
    $477,581
    @ $241.45 · 2025-06-13
    CARESTIO DANIEL A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.28M
    @ $242.56 · 2025-06-05
    MAJORS CARY L
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $250.08 · 2025-05-20
    MAJORS CARY L
    Officer
    $365,532
    @ $217.32 · 2024-11-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    STE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    STE
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView STE Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs STE

    Is Alphabet Inc. or STERIS plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, STE trades at a -21.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $186 vs. price $227), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or STERIS plc?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while STE scores 63/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. STE scores 5.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or STERIS plc?▼

    STERIS plc (STE) generates a 3.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or STERIS plc?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus STE's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or STERIS plc's?▼

    STE's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). STE has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs STE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io