SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs SNPS

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. SNPS is overvalued at $456, with an intrinsic value of $299 and a margin of safety of -52%. Of the two, SNPS has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
SNPS
Synopsys, Inc.
$455.51

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
SNPS
  • ★Gross margin of 82.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.73 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

GOOGL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
SNPS
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 14.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 22% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 104.7x is 105% above the historical average of 51.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
SNPS
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$3.54B
1.63%
FCF Yield
4.06%
28.09
Trailing P/E
104.71
25.39
Forward P/E
26.41
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
1.72%
38.88%
ROE
3.82%
60.37%
Gross Margin
82.60%
1.47
PEG Ratio
2.84
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.27
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.93
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
GOOGL: 8Ties: 2SNPS: 2
GOOGLSNPS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SNPS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SNPS
$8.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$38.71B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SNPS
52.4% Overvalued
Price is 52.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $455.51
Fair Value: $298.93
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

SNPS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $456?

+20.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.8%

The market implies +20.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +11.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SNPS
66/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SNPS
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SNPS
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 91.4%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,059
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SNPS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $148,904
PAINTER ROBERT G
Director
$148,904
@ $425.44 · 2025-09-11
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SNPS
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $18.71M
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$132,500
@ $530.00 · 2026-01-12
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$127,500
@ $510.00 · 2026-01-07
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.69M
@ $460.77 · 2025-12-19
KANKANWADI SUDHINDRA
Officer
$7.84M
@ $493.76 · 2025-09-22
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$2.23M
@ $609.77 · 2025-09-05
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.69M
@ $589.01 · 2025-09-02
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$4.25M
@ $471.21 · 2025-06-18
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$3.55M
@ $485.72 · 2025-06-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $457.93 · 2025-06-02
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.98M
@ $444.42 · 2025-03-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.27M
@ $463.75 · 2025-03-03
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$10.54M
@ $506.01 · 2025-01-15
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.70M
@ $553.89 · 2024-08-23
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$305,954
@ $620.60 · 2024-07-15
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$8.22M
@ $620.77 · 2024-07-11
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$20.55M
@ $618.97 · 2024-07-08
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.35M
@ $610.52 · 2024-07-03
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$10.30M
@ $603.27 · 2024-07-01
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.66M
@ $602.06 · 2024-06-27
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.05M
@ $600.40 · 2024-06-25
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$2.03M
@ $611.41 · 2024-06-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SNPS
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
SNPS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView SNPS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs SNPS

Is Alphabet Inc. or Synopsys, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SNPS trades at a -52.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $299 vs. price $456), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.?▼

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while SNPS scores 66/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SNPS scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.?▼

Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) generates a 4.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.?▼

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus SNPS's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.