SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs SMCI

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
SMCI
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$27.09

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
SMCI
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.99 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★FCF yield of 9.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.41 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
SMCI
  • ⚠Gross margin of 8.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 14% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
SMCI
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.53B
1.57%
FCF Yield
9.42%
29.42
Trailing P/E
19.77
27.06
Forward P/E
9.07
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
6.76%
27.61%
ROE
15.00%
60.37%
Gross Margin
8.02%
0.36
PEG Ratio
1.03
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.75
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.06
0.22%
Dividend Yield
N/A
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1SMCI: 3
GOOGLSMCI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

SMCI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SMCI
$4.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SMCI
78.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 78.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.09
Fair Value: $125.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

SMCI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+5.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.1%

The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SMCI
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SMCI
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SMCI
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 56.4%Retail & Other 29.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,060
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SMCI
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SMCI
0
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.11M
TUAN SHERMAN
Director
$1.60M
@ $33.00 · 2025-11-26
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.87M
@ $32.83 · 2025-11-24
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $45.14 · 2025-09-15
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $40.29 · 2025-09-03
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.76M
@ $43.88 · 2025-08-22
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$12.00M
@ $60.00 · 2025-07-28
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$13.50M
@ $45.00 · 2025-06-18
WEIGAND DAVID E
Chief Financial Officer
$2.95M
@ $44.02 · 2025-05-20
LIANG CHARLES
Chief Executive Officer
$8.99M
@ $44.95 · 2025-05-14
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$1.30M
@ $45.86 · 2025-05-14
BLAIR ROBERT L
Director
$828,557
@ $42.58 · 2025-02-28
LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$2.32M
@ $50.17 · 2025-02-26
KAO GEORGE W
Officer
$3.62M
@ $50.48 · 2025-02-26
FAIRFAX DANIEL W
Director
$240,600
@ $802.00 · 2024-06-03
LIU TALLY C
Director
$419,586
@ $839.17 · 2024-05-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SMCI
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
SMCI
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView SMCI Full Analysis
GOOGL vs SMCI: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io