Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs SLB

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs SLB N.V. (SLB): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. SLB is undervalued at $54, with an intrinsic value of $155 and a margin of safety of 65%. Of the two, SLB has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
SLB
SLB N.V.
$53.74

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
SLB
  • ★SLB N.V. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★SLB N.V. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
    SLB
    • ⚠Gross margin of 16.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.14 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    SLB
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.54B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    5.73%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    26.09
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    17.41
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    10.22%
    44.29%
    ROE
    11.66%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    16.59%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.50
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.34
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.25
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.20%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 1SLB: 4
    GOOGLSLB

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    SLB

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    SLB
    $-2.44
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.59B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-18.53B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    SLB
    61.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 61.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $53.74
    Fair Value: $140.79
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    SLB

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $54?

    +10.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.3%

    The market implies +10.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    SLB
    79/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    SLB
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    SLB
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.0%Retail & Other 5.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,292
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    SLB
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    SLB
    6
    Sells (3M)
    22
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.50M
    GUILD HOWARD
    Officer
    $539,022
    @ $53.65 · 2026-10-29
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $53.17 · 2026-10-27
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.10M
    @ $60.00 · 2026-09-01
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $300,000
    @ $60.00 · 2026-08-31
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $275,000
    @ $55.00 · 2026-08-27
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.31M
    @ $52.55 · 2026-08-26
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $56.99 · 2026-05-27
    DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
    Director
    $108,660
    @ $54.33 · 2026-05-07
    GASSEN STEVE MATTHEW
    Officer
    $3.00M
    @ $56.18 · 2026-05-01
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $56.48 · 2026-04-29
    DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
    Director
    $208,100
    @ $52.02 · 2026-03-26
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $50.56 · 2026-03-25
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.30M
    @ $52.00 · 2026-02-25
    LE PEUCH OLIVIER
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $50.40 · 2026-01-28
    GUILD HOWARD
    Officer
    $659,420
    @ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
    DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
    Director
    $201,160
    @ $50.29 · 2026-01-26
    MERAD ABDELLAH
    Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
    BIGUET STEPHANE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.03M
    @ $49.70 · 2026-01-26
    RALSTON DIANNE B
    Officer
    $921,542
    @ $49.50 · 2026-01-26
    COLEMAN PETER JOHN
    Director
    $197,010
    @ $35.82 · 2025-11-26
    BIGUET STEPHANE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $36.75 · 2025-11-13
    MERAD ABDELLAH
    Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $37.69 · 2025-11-11
    RALSTON DIANNE B
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $36.08 · 2025-09-12
    DE LA CHEVARDIERE PATRICK
    Director
    $167,900
    @ $33.58 · 2025-05-22
    RAMAN APARNA
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $42.28 · 2025-03-28
    RENNICK GAVIN
    Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $40.92 · 2025-02-26
    RANDO BEJAR CARMEN
    Officer
    $223,252
    @ $40.41 · 2025-01-31
    MERAD ABDELLAH
    Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $41.44 · 2025-01-29
    AL MOGHARBEL KHALED
    Officer
    $5.43M
    @ $44.09 · 2025-01-21
    GUILD HOWARD
    Officer
    $595,228
    @ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
    PRECHNER UGO
    Officer
    $309,435
    @ $44.20 · 2025-01-21
    KASIBHATLA VIJAY
    Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $43.94 · 2025-01-21
    BIGUET STEPHANE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.97M
    @ $43.87 · 2025-01-21
    RALSTON DIANNE B
    Officer
    $1.90M
    @ $43.96 · 2025-01-21
    BIGUET STEPHANE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $512,294
    @ $44.47 · 2024-11-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    SLB
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    SLB
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView SLB Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs SLB

    Is Alphabet Inc. or SLB N.V. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, SLB trades at a 65.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $155 vs. price $54), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or SLB N.V.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while SLB scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SLB scores 2.8 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or SLB N.V.?▼

    SLB N.V. (SLB) generates a 5.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or SLB N.V.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus SLB's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or SLB N.V.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to SLB's 85/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs SLB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io