Compare StocksGOOGL vs SCHW

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GOOGL is overvalued at $356, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of -250%. SCHW is undervalued at $105, with an intrinsic value of $272 and a margin of safety of 61%. Of the two, SCHW has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$356.13
VS
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
$105.24

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
SCHW
  • Gross margin of 97.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 100.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.89 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
SCHW
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.41 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $7.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
SCHW
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.68%
FCF Yield
N/A
17.86
Trailing P/E
19.17
24.17
Forward P/E
13.44
Quality & Moat
15.75%
ROIC
12.23%
48.68%
ROE
20.28%
60.90%
Gross Margin
97.50%
0.97
PEG Ratio
1.06
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.25%
Dividend Yield
1.22%
GOOGL: 4Ties: 1SCHW: 4
GOOGLSCHW

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SCHW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SCHW
$1.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$12.98B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.38B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
250.3% Overvalued
Price is 250.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $356.13
Fair Value: $101.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SCHW
61.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.24
Fair Value: $272.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $356?

+22.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

SCHW

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SCHW
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SCHW
-2.16
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,325
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SCHW
Insiders 6.2%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,973
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SCHW
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.85M
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.85M
@ $84.23 · 2026-05-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SCHW
4
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.52M
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$2.94M
@ $105.01 · 2026-07-28
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$3.43M
@ $104.01 · 2026-07-27
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$709,341
@ $102.03 · 2026-07-23
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$422,069
@ $104.14 · 2026-07-21
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$4.09M
@ $99.00 · 2026-04-14
HOWARD DENNIS
Chief Technology Officer
$956,228
@ $94.60 · 2026-03-03
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$681,454
@ $94.61 · 2026-03-03
HOWARD DENNIS
Officer
$2.65M
@ $95.02 · 2026-02-25
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$792,796
@ $104.38 · 2026-02-02
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$4.85M
@ $97.00 · 2025-08-27
WURSTER RICHARD A.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.03M
@ $99.16 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.36M
@ $97.91 · 2025-07-29
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$1.88M
@ $90.01 · 2025-06-18
MURTAGH NIGEL J.
Officer
$2.21M
@ $88.20 · 2025-05-28
MORGAN PETER J. III
General Counsel
$889,295
@ $87.39 · 2025-05-22
RUFFEL CHARLES ANTHONY
Director
$486,986
@ $87.65 · 2025-05-21
BETTINGER WALTER W II
Chairman of the Board
$17.05M
@ $89.00 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SCHW
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
SCHW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView SCHW Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs SCHW

Is Alphabet Inc. or The Charles Schwab Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SCHW trades at a 61.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $272 vs. price $105), compared to GOOGL's -250.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $356).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or The Charles Schwab Corporation?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while SCHW scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Charles Schwab Corporation in financial distress?

SCHW's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or The Charles Schwab Corporation?

GOOGL earns 15.7% ROIC versus SCHW's 12.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or The Charles Schwab Corporation's?

SCHW's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). SCHW has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

GOOGL vs SCHW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io