Compare StocksGOOGL vs RSG

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Republic Services, Inc. (RSG)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
$206.56

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
RSG
  • Republic Services, Inc. scores 76/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.88 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
RSG
  • PEG ratio of 4.07 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
RSG
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$2.41B
1.57%
FCF Yield
3.77%
29.42
Trailing P/E
30.11
27.06
Forward P/E
25.67
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
9.91%
27.61%
ROE
17.87%
60.37%
Gross Margin
43.01%
0.36
PEG Ratio
4.07
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
1.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.67
0.22%
Dividend Yield
1.21%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 2RSG: 3
GOOGLRSG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

RSG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RSG
$6.36
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$24.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RSG
50.8% Overvalued
Price is 50.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $206.56
Fair Value: $136.95
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

RSG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $207?

+15.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.2%

The market implies +15.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +14.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RSG
76/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RSG
-2.74
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RSG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 96.7%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,818
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RSG
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.10M
WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
Director
$100,122
@ $209.46 · 2025-12-09
CASCADE INVESTMENT, L.L.C.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.00M
@ $234.91 · 2025-08-19
WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
Director
$100,040
@ $185.26 · 2024-06-04
VOLPE SANDRA M
Director
$14,803
@ $187.38 · 2024-05-15
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RSG
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.78M
BRUMMER GREGG
Chief Operating Officer
$1.72M
@ $233.94 · 2025-08-22
CARLSEN ELYSE
Officer
$59,495
@ $253.17 · 2025-06-05
RICHARDSON LARSON
Officer
$525,954
@ $239.07 · 2025-03-03
BRUMMER GREGG
Chief Operating Officer
$1.44M
@ $228.20 · 2025-02-19
WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
Director
$400,187
@ $215.27 · 2024-12-05
DELGHIACCIO BRIAN M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.07M
@ $210.02 · 2024-11-19
COLLINS TOMAGO
Director
$649,625
@ $203.01 · 2024-08-16
HODGES AMANDA
Officer
$1.21M
@ $186.02 · 2024-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RSG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
RSG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView RSG Full Analysis
GOOGL vs RSG: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io