Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs ROP

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. ROP is fairly valued at $467, with an intrinsic value of $476 and a margin of safety of 2%. Of the two, ROP has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$466.60

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
ROP
  • ★Gross margin of 69.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 54.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 18.5x is 38% below the historical average of 29.8x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

GOOGL
    ROP
    • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠Insiders have sold $6.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ROP
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.44B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    5.28%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    18.46
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    18.99
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    6.62%
    44.29%
    ROE
    13.23%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    69.67%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.78
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.49
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.86
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    0.78%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 2ROP: 4
    GOOGLROP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    ROP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ROP
    $0.46
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $3.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ROP
    2.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 2.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $466.60
    Fair Value: $476.12
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    ROP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $467?

    +10.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.5%

    The market implies +10.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ROP
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ROP
    -2.54
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ROP
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 106.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,543
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ROP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.57M
    JOYCE THOMAS PATRICK JR
    Director
    $501,844
    @ $358.46 · 2026-02-06
    BRINKLEY AMY WOODS
    Director
    $540,856
    @ $450.71 · 2025-11-12
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.52M
    @ $452.23 · 2025-11-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ROP
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $25.86M
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    Officer
    $1.57M
    @ $449.04 · 2026-10-26
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.23M
    @ $435.53 · 2026-10-23
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    Officer
    $758,100
    @ $379.05 · 2026-07-27
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $2.32M
    @ $361.00 · 2026-07-24
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.67M
    @ $445.56 · 2025-12-01
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.31M
    @ $443.57 · 2025-11-11
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $210,158
    @ $525.39 · 2025-08-15
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $846,255
    @ $564.17 · 2025-07-23
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $195,800
    @ $556.25 · 2025-07-22
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $200,277
    @ $572.22 · 2025-05-05
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.76M
    @ $588.19 · 2025-02-25
    CROSS BRANDON L
    Officer
    $433,372
    @ $577.83 · 2025-02-04
    STIPANCICH JOHN K
    General Counsel
    $578,040
    @ $578.04 · 2025-01-31
    CONLEY JASON
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.73M
    @ $578.05 · 2025-01-31
    WALLMAN RICHARD F.
    Director
    $201,913
    @ $575.25 · 2025-01-31
    JOHNSON ROBERT D.
    Director
    $528,092
    @ $561.80 · 2024-12-03
    HUNN LAURENCE NEIL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $17.17M
    @ $572.47 · 2024-11-08
    WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER B
    Director
    $387,366
    @ $568.82 · 2024-11-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ROP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    ROP
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView ROP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs ROP

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ROP trades at a 2.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $476 vs. price $467), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while ROP scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROP scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?▼

    Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus ROP's 6.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Roper Technologies, Inc.'s?▼

    ROP's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). ROP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs ROP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io