Compare StocksGOOGL vs RF

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GOOGL is overvalued at $356, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of -250%. RF is undervalued at $31, with an intrinsic value of $51064144574 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, RF has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$356.13
VS
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
$30.95

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
RF
  • Regions Financial Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
RF
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 8.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
RF
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
1.68%
FCF Yield
N/A
17.86
Trailing P/E
12.58
24.17
Forward P/E
10.88
Quality & Moat
15.75%
ROIC
29.47%
48.68%
ROE
11.87%
60.90%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.97
PEG Ratio
1.80
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.25%
Dividend Yield
3.54%
GOOGL: 3Ties: 1RF: 4
GOOGLRF

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RF

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RF
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.24B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.54
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
250.3% Overvalued
Price is 250.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $356.13
Fair Value: $101.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RF
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.95
Fair Value: $51064144574.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $356?

+22.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

RF

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RF
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RF
-2.32
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,325
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RF
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,451
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RF
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $101,906
JENKINS ROGER W
Director
$101,906
@ $25.48 · 2025-08-13
JOHNSON JOIA M
Director
$48,702
@ $21.17 · 2025-03-11
SUQUET JOSE S
Director
$57,687
@ $23.96 · 2025-01-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RF
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.98M
WILLMAN BRIAN R
Officer
$195,750
@ $27.91 · 2026-05-07
RITTER WILLIAM D
Officer
$1.04M
@ $28.78 · 2026-01-22
KEENAN DAVID R
Officer
$750,279
@ $25.01 · 2025-08-06
WILLMAN BRIAN R
Officer
$174,885
@ $21.37 · 2025-05-08
SUQUET JOSE S
Director
$5,371
@ $23.98 · 2025-02-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RF
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
RF
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView RF Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs RF

Is Alphabet Inc. or Regions Financial Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RF trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $51064144574 vs. price $31), compared to GOOGL's -250.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $356).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Regions Financial Corporation?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while RF scores 84/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Regions Financial Corporation in financial distress?

RF's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Regions Financial Corporation?

RF earns 29.5% ROIC versus GOOGL's 15.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Regions Financial Corporation's?

RF's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). RF has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.