SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs REGN

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. REGN is undervalued at $610, with an intrinsic value of $1572 and a margin of safety of 61%. Of the two, REGN has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$609.94

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
REGN
  • ★Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 14.9x is 22% below the historical average of 19.2x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 7.56 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
REGN
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 7.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.15 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
REGN
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$3.27B
1.63%
FCF Yield
5.12%
28.09
Trailing P/E
14.90
25.39
Forward P/E
11.34
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
7.13%
38.88%
ROE
14.55%
60.37%
Gross Margin
43.89%
1.47
PEG Ratio
1.07
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.38
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.61%
GOOGL: 4Ties: 1REGN: 7
GOOGLREGN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

REGN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
REGN
$0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$12.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
REGN
61.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $609.94
Fair Value: $1572.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

REGN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $610?

+1.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.0%

The market implies +1.6% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +6.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
REGN
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
REGN
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
REGN
Insiders 2.0%Institutions 92.3%Retail & Other 5.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,990
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
REGN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
REGN
2
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.47M
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$70,524
@ $705.24 · 2026-05-01
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$77,727
@ $777.27 · 2026-04-01
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$78,550
@ $785.50 · 2026-03-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$1.28M
@ $781.33 · 2026-02-19
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$77,853
@ $778.53 · 2026-02-09
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$1.59M
@ $778.52 · 2026-02-09
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$1.20M
@ $800.00 · 2026-01-07
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$570,000
@ $750.00 · 2025-11-20
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$280,766
@ $651.43 · 2025-11-07
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$4.25M
@ $654.27 · 2025-10-29
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$844,610
@ $844.61 · 2024-11-01
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$104,878
@ $1048.78 · 2024-10-01
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.05M
@ $1054.06 · 2024-10-01
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$117,868
@ $1178.68 · 2024-09-03
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.18M
@ $1178.73 · 2024-09-03
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$12.55M
@ $1158.17 · 2024-08-15
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$884,520
@ $1170.00 · 2024-08-15
MURPHY ANDREW J
Officer
$7.34M
@ $1153.15 · 2024-08-14
STAHL NEIL E
Officer
$5.64M
@ $1084.54 · 2024-08-08
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$521,090
@ $1070.00 · 2024-08-07
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$842,940
@ $1115.00 · 2024-08-02
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$107,467
@ $1085.53 · 2024-08-01
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$1,100
@ $1100.00 · 2024-08-01
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.21M
@ $1060.86 · 2024-08-01
LAROSA JOSEPH J
General Counsel
$2.03M
@ $1088.95 · 2024-07-11
RYAN ARTHUR F
Director
$105,924
@ $1059.24 · 2024-07-01
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.19M
@ $1047.11 · 2024-07-01
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$802,872
@ $1062.00 · 2024-06-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
REGN
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
REGN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView REGN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs REGN

Is Alphabet Inc. or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, REGN trades at a 61.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1572 vs. price $610), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while REGN scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. REGN scores 7.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) generates a 5.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus REGN's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s?▼

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to REGN's 85/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

GOOGL vs REGN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io