Compare StocksGOOGL vs RCL

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. RCL is undervalued at $313, with an intrinsic value of $458 and a margin of safety of 32%. Of the two, RCL has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$312.51

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
RCL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.02 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
RCL
  • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
RCL
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$-194.88M
1.63%
FCF Yield
-0.23%
28.09
Trailing P/E
19.07
25.39
Forward P/E
15.61
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
11.95%
38.88%
ROE
49.58%
60.37%
Gross Margin
50.91%
1.47
PEG Ratio
1.48
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
2.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.08
0.24%
Dividend Yield
1.60%
GOOGL: 6Ties: 2RCL: 4
GOOGLRCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RCL
$7.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.91B
Δ Market Cap
+$62.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RCL
31.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 31.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $312.51
Fair Value: $457.80
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

RCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
RCL
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RCL
-2.85
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RCL
Insiders 1.8%Institutions 90.3%Retail & Other 7.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,623
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$749,000
@ $140.00 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RCL
0
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $88.33M
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$453,137
@ $327.17 · 2026-02-17
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$2.56M
@ $326.21 · 2026-02-17
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.46M
@ $327.99 · 2026-02-13
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$26.15M
@ $326.82 · 2026-02-13
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$29.71M
@ $326.81 · 2026-02-13
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$16.74M
@ $327.39 · 2026-02-13
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$309,936
@ $281.76 · 2025-11-03
SORENSEN VAGN O
Director
$3.40M
@ $330.04 · 2025-08-19
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.98M
@ $311.02 · 2025-08-06
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.72M
@ $329.47 · 2025-07-30
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$860,270
@ $299.85 · 2025-06-27
LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
Officer
$687,500
@ $275.00 · 2025-06-06
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$4.96M
@ $253.10 · 2025-05-19
MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
Director
$363,735
@ $242.49 · 2025-05-12
BAYLEY MICHAEL W
Officer
$12.88M
@ $262.07 · 2025-02-18
LIBERTY JASON T
Chief Executive Officer
$15.19M
@ $261.95 · 2025-02-18
HOLTZ NAFTALI
Chief Financial Officer
$4.45M
@ $261.62 · 2025-02-18
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$3.93M
@ $261.86 · 2025-02-18
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$5.01M
@ $256.68 · 2025-02-13
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$763,923
@ $234.62 · 2024-11-20
KULOVAARA HARRI U
Officer
$4.06M
@ $209.58 · 2024-11-05
PUJOL HENRY L
Officer
$1.40M
@ $208.51 · 2024-10-30
BETHGE LAURA H
Officer
$518,446
@ $168.71 · 2024-08-29
SORENSEN VAGN O
Director
$919,300
@ $158.50 · 2024-08-15
FAIN RICHARD DAVID
Director
$3.02M
@ $156.25 · 2024-07-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RCL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
RCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView RCL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs RCL

Is Alphabet Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, RCL trades at a 31.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $458 vs. price $313), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while RCL scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in financial distress?

RCL's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s -0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus RCL's 11.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to RCL's 73/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

GOOGL vs RCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io