Compare StocksGOOGL vs Q

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$143.33

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
Q

    Risks

    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.91 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Q
    Valuation
    $73.27B
    Free Cash Flow
    $776.50M
    1.57%
    FCF Yield
    2.58%
    29.42
    Trailing P/E
    43.43
    27.06
    Forward P/E
    32.66
    Quality & Moat
    20.98%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    27.61%
    ROE
    9.39%
    60.37%
    Gross Margin
    46.17%
    0.36
    PEG Ratio
    2.91
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Debt / Equity
    0.61
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.19
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.58
    0.22%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    GOOGL: 9Ties: 2Q: 1
    GOOGLQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    241.8% Overvalued
    Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $385.69
    Fair Value: $112.84
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    54.9% Overvalued
    Price is 54.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $143.33
    Fair Value: $92.54
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

    +23.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $143?

    +19.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +18.3%

    The market implies +19.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,168
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 25.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,353
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $828,193
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis
    GOOGL vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io