Compare StocksGOOGL vs PSX

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Phillips 66 (PSX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. PSX is fairly valued at $166, with an intrinsic value of $183 and a margin of safety of 9%. Of the two, PSX has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
PSX
Phillips 66
$166.14

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PSX
  • Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
PSX
  • ROIC has declined by 10.2 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 12.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.4x is 38% above the historical average of 11.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
PSX
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$-1.13B
1.63%
FCF Yield
-1.70%
28.09
Trailing P/E
16.43
25.39
Forward P/E
9.62
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
1.20%
38.88%
ROE
14.55%
60.37%
Gross Margin
12.52%
1.47
PEG Ratio
1.00
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.74
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.12
0.24%
Dividend Yield
2.91%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1PSX: 4
GOOGLPSX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PSX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PSX
$0.42
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$7.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PSX
9.2% Overvalued
Price is 9.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $166.14
Fair Value: $152.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

PSX

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PSX
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PSX
-2.79
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PSX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 80.9%Retail & Other 18.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,575
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PSX
1
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.25M
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,297
@ $173.13 · 2026-05-06
MEYERS KEVIN OMAR
Director
$30,310
@ $173.20 · 2026-03-17
HAYES GREGORY J
Director
$1.00M
@ $119.90 · 2025-08-14
CORNELIUS SIGMUND L
Director
$61,775
@ $123.55 · 2025-07-31
HEIM MICHAEL A
Director
$125,970
@ $125.97 · 2025-07-30
PEASE ROBERT W.
Director
$49,980
@ $113.85 · 2025-05-22
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PSX
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $35.24M
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$5.10M
@ $170.04 · 2026-05-11
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.97M
@ $190.07 · 2026-03-30
DAVIS LISA ANN
Director
$662,617
@ $174.37 · 2026-03-13
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$7.26M
@ $169.53 · 2026-03-12
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$3.65M
@ $167.50 · 2026-03-05
BALDRIDGE DONALD A
Officer
$1.20M
@ $160.00 · 2026-02-17
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$659,100
@ $150.00 · 2026-02-04
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$637,130
@ $145.00 · 2026-01-09
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$3.57M
@ $140.04 · 2025-12-01
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$3.61M
@ $137.68 · 2025-11-18
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$4.14M
@ $138.00 · 2025-11-07
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$615,020
@ $140.00 · 2025-09-26
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$593,055
@ $135.00 · 2025-09-09
SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN
General Counsel
$571,090
@ $130.00 · 2025-07-08
MANDELL BRIAN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $125.00 · 2025-06-18
MITCHELL KEVIN J
Chief Financial Officer
$4.17M
@ $139.01 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PSX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
PSX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PSX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PSX

Is Alphabet Inc. or Phillips 66 more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PSX trades at a 9.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $183 vs. price $166), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Phillips 66?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PSX scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PSX scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Phillips 66?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Phillips 66's -1.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Phillips 66?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus PSX's 1.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Phillips 66's?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PSX's 79/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.