Compare StocksGOOGL vs PRU

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GOOGL is overvalued at $356, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of -250%. PRU is undervalued at $122, with an intrinsic value of $51045422464 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PRU has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$356.13
VS
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$122.08

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PRU
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $18.55 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
PRU
  • Prudential Financial, Inc. scores only 15/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
PRU
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$10.38B
1.68%
FCF Yield
N/A
17.86
Trailing P/E
12.57
24.17
Forward P/E
8.36
Quality & Moat
15.75%
ROIC
2.61%
48.68%
ROE
10.71%
60.90%
Gross Margin
28.96%
0.97
PEG Ratio
1.33
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.48
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.30
0.25%
Dividend Yield
4.59%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1PRU: 3
GOOGLPRU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PRU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PRU
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.42
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
250.3% Overvalued
Price is 250.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $356.13
Fair Value: $101.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PRU
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $122.08
Fair Value: $51045422463.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $356?

+22.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

PRU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $122?

-13.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -13.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PRU
15/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PRU
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,325
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PRU
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 64.5%Retail & Other 35.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,809
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PRU
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $168,840
STODDARD THOMAS D
Director
$25,742
@ $102.97 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Director
$42,128
@ $105.32 · 2026-02-11
CHAPPUIS JACQUES P
Officer
$100,970
@ $100.97 · 2026-02-06
DI SIBIO CARMINE
Director
$22,208
@ $111.04 · 2025-02-20
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$42,364
@ $116.38 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PRU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.64M
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$1.40M
@ $103.25 · 2026-05-14
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$762,215
@ $116.28 · 2025-12-11
SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
Officer
$861,520
@ $107.69 · 2025-12-02
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chairman of the Board
$5.17M
@ $107.39 · 2025-11-10
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$438,600
@ $109.65 · 2025-08-29
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$635,880
@ $105.98 · 2025-03-12
TODMAN MICHAEL A
Director
$333,291
@ $112.98 · 2025-02-07
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$3.19M
@ $124.10 · 2024-11-07
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chief Executive Officer
$23.45M
@ $126.29 · 2024-11-07
FALZON ROBERT M
Officer
$6.76M
@ $128.26 · 2024-11-06
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$133,167
@ $119.97 · 2024-09-03
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$322,028
@ $113.43 · 2024-08-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PRU
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
PRU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PRU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PRU

Is Alphabet Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PRU trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $51045422464 vs. price $122), compared to GOOGL's -250.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $356).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PRU scores 15/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Prudential Financial, Inc. in financial distress?

PRU's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc.?

GOOGL earns 15.7% ROIC versus PRU's 2.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Prudential Financial, Inc.'s?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PRU's 84/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

GOOGL vs PRU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io