Compare StocksGOOGL vs PPL

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs PPL Corporation (PPL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. PPL is overvalued at $35, with an intrinsic value of $10 and a margin of safety of -252%. Of the two, PPL has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
PPL
PPL Corporation
$35.38

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PPL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.37 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
PPL
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
PPL
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$-1.62B
1.63%
FCF Yield
-6.07%
28.09
Trailing P/E
21.71
25.39
Forward P/E
16.71
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
5.66%
38.88%
ROE
8.32%
60.37%
Gross Margin
43.29%
1.47
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
1.27
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.22
0.24%
Dividend Yield
3.13%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 2PPL: 3
GOOGLPPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PPL
$8.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$564.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$4.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PPL
251.9% Overvalued
Price is 251.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $35.38
Fair Value: $10.05
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

PPL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PPL
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PPL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PPL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 89.1%Retail & Other 10.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,306
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PPL
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $905,690
CORNETT JOHN GREGORY
Officer
$250,734
@ $35.56 · 2026-06-12
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$577,319
@ $36.56 · 2025-08-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$77,637
@ $35.86 · 2025-07-29
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$37,638
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Chief Operating Officer
$61,810
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$10,704
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
GOSMAN ANGELA K
Officer
$226,434
@ $34.66 · 2025-05-23
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$39,858
@ $34.78 · 2025-02-28
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$76,117
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$153,149
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$258,528
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$573,402
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$47,676
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$32,844
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$52,628
@ $33.12 · 2025-01-27
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$213,510
@ $32.16 · 2024-12-17
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$314,680
@ $34.35 · 2024-11-21
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$151,781
@ $31.74 · 2024-08-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
PPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PPL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PPL

Is Alphabet Inc. or PPL Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PPL trades at a -251.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $10 vs. price $35), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or PPL Corporation?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PPL scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is PPL Corporation in financial distress?

PPL's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or PPL Corporation?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to PPL Corporation's -6.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or PPL Corporation?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus PPL's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or PPL Corporation's?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PPL's 66/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.