Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs PG

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. PG is overvalued at $162, with an intrinsic value of $124 and a margin of safety of -30%. Of the two, PG has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$161.57

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PG
  • ★The Procter & Gamble Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★The Procter & Gamble Company scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

GOOGL
    PG
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.15 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠18 insider sales totaling $13.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    PG
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $12.65B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    3.38%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    24.33
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    21.85
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    19.80%
    44.29%
    ROE
    29.61%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    50.59%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    4.15
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.43
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.94
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.69%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 1PG: 4
    GOOGLPG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PG
    $1.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $17.48B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$29.32B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PG
    30.3% Overvalued
    Price is 30.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $161.57
    Fair Value: $124.02
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $162?

    +10.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.9%

    The market implies +10.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PG
    92/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PG
    -2.63
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PG
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.8%Retail & Other 28.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,035
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PG
    18
    Sells (3M)
    26
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $69.22M
    PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
    Officer
    $671,929
    @ $160.71 · 2026-10-23
    GAMA PAUL
    Officer
    $698,460
    @ $161.27 · 2026-10-23
    JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.71M
    @ $163.09 · 2026-10-23
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $344,310
    @ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
    SCHULTEN ANDRE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $568,861
    @ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
    GAMA PAUL
    Officer
    $323,382
    @ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
    JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
    Officer
    $52,141
    @ $145.24 · 2026-08-24
    RAMAN SUNDAR G.
    Officer
    $491,274
    @ $143.02 · 2026-08-21
    JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
    Officer
    $22,431
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    SCHULTEN ANDRE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $776,754
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
    Officer
    $438,991
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
    Officer
    $290,312
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    BHARUCHA FREDDY P
    Officer
    $35,372
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    GAMA PAUL
    Officer
    $488,311
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    ABD EL HAK HESHAM
    Officer
    $278,377
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
    Chief Executive Officer
    $888,047
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
    AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
    Officer
    $438,991
    @ $143.79 · 2026-08-19
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $144.00 · 2026-08-18
    FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
    Officer
    $917,199
    @ $165.29 · 2026-02-27
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $288,454
    @ $159.45 · 2026-02-19
    AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $162.28 · 2026-02-13
    MOELLER JON R
    Officer and Director
    $28.12M
    @ $162.29 · 2026-02-12
    COOMBE GARY A
    Officer
    $5.86M
    @ $162.33 · 2026-02-12
    PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
    Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $160.31 · 2026-02-11
    FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $158.00 · 2026-02-04
    PRITCHARD MARC S
    Officer
    $14.50M
    @ $151.15 · 2026-01-23
    JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
    Officer
    $108,438
    @ $149.57 · 2025-10-30
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $366,574
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    DAVIS JENNIFER L
    Officer
    $491,252
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    SCHULTEN ANDRE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $647,289
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
    Officer
    $74,594
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    MOELLER JON R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    COOMBE GARY A
    Officer
    $538,139
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $606,796
    @ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $156,835
    @ $156.84 · 2025-08-29
    RAMAN SUNDAR G.
    Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
    COOMBE GARY A
    Officer
    $1.61M
    @ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
    WHALEY SUSAN STREET
    Officer
    $969,908
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
    Officer
    $50,170
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    DAVIS JENNIFER L
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    SCHULTEN ANDRE
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.83M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
    Officer
    $95,308
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    PRITCHARD MARC S
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    MOELLER JON R
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.31M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    PG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PG Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PG

    Is Alphabet Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, PG trades at a -30.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $124 vs. price $162), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

    PG scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PG scores 5.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

    The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) generates a 3.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

    PG earns 19.8% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or The Procter & Gamble Company's?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PG's 69/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs PG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io