Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs PFG

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. PFG is undervalued at $112, with an intrinsic value of $153 and a margin of safety of 27%. Of the two, PFG has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$111.63

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
PFG
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 13.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★FCF yield of 18.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

GOOGL
    PFG
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.15 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    PFG
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.44B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    18.72%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    12.43
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    11.00
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    14.07%
    44.29%
    ROE
    16.11%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    48.40%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.06
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.28
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    3.05%
    GOOGL: 5Ties: 2PFG: 5
    GOOGLPFG

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PFG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PFG
    $-0.89
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.41B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.26B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PFG
    27.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 27.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $111.63
    Fair Value: $153.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PFG

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

    +5.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -11.6%

    The market implies +5.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -11.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PFG
    49/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PFG
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PFG
    Insiders 1.1%Institutions 82.2%Retail & Other 16.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,327
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PFG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $873.00
    MURUZABAL CLAUDIO
    Director
    $873.00
    @ $87.30 · 2026-02-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PFG
    0
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.63M
    CHEONG WEE YEE
    Officer
    $1.11M
    @ $103.13 · 2026-05-21
    CHEONG WEE YEE
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $101.17 · 2026-05-01
    DJURASOVIC GEORGE
    General Counsel
    $259,332
    @ $100.87 · 2026-04-30
    CHEONG WEE YEE
    Officer
    $109,080
    @ $101.00 · 2026-04-29
    STRABLE-SOETHOUT DEANNA D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $697,300
    @ $95.00 · 2026-01-30
    STRABLE-SOETHOUT DEANNA D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $884,616
    @ $95.12 · 2026-01-29
    CHEONG WEE YEE
    Officer
    $160,470
    @ $85.04 · 2025-11-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PFG
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    PFG
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView PFG Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs PFG

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Principal Financial Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFG trades at a 27.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $153 vs. price $112), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Principal Financial Group, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PFG scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Principal Financial Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    PFG's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Principal Financial Group, Inc.?▼

    Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) generates a 18.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Principal Financial Group, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus PFG's 14.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Principal Financial Group, Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFG's 84/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs PFG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io