Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs NEE

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. NEE is overvalued at $84, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -281%. Of the two, NEE has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$83.71

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
NEE
  • ★Gross margin of 60.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 15.1x is 41% below the historical average of 25.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

GOOGL
    NEE
    • ⚠NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 8.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.12 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    NEE
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-21.21B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    -12.08%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    15.08
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    19.13
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    3.99%
    44.29%
    ROE
    14.06%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    60.17%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.71
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.46
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    8.09
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.98%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 4NEE: 1
    GOOGLNEE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    NEE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NEE
    $0.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $8.39B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.11B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NEE
    281.3% Overvalued
    Price is 281.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $83.71
    Fair Value: $21.95
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    NEE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    NEE
    24/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NEE
    -2.48
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NEE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 86.5%Retail & Other 13.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,828
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NEE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NEE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $31.07M
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $458,862
    @ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $347,088
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $646,423
    @ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $482,505
    @ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
    KETCHUM JOHN W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.90M
    @ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $1.68M
    @ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $920,210
    @ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
    REAGAN RONALD R
    Officer
    $985,481
    @ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
    PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
    Director
    $12.18M
    @ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $906,880
    @ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $62,943
    @ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $63,365
    @ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
    LEMASNEY MARK
    Officer
    $60,827
    @ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
    DUNNE MICHAEL
    Chief Financial Officer
    $707,900
    @ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
    COFFEY ROBERT
    Officer
    $538,800
    @ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer and Treasurer
    $168,718
    @ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
    SIEVING CHARLES E
    Officer
    $1.66M
    @ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
    MAY JAMES MICHAEL
    Officer
    $162,258
    @ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
    DAGGS NICOLE J
    Officer
    $302,809
    @ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NEE
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    NEE
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView NEE Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs NEE

    Is Alphabet Inc. or NextEra Energy, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, NEE trades at a -281.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $84), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or NextEra Energy, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while NEE scores 24/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is NextEra Energy, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    NEE's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or NextEra Energy, Inc.?▼

    Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a -0.0% free cash flow yield, compared to NextEra Energy, Inc.'s -12.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or NextEra Energy, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus NEE's 4.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or NextEra Energy, Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to NEE's 54/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.