Compare StocksGOOGL vs NCLH

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. NCLH is overvalued at $20, with an intrinsic value of $11 and a margin of safety of -90%. Of the two, NCLH has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
$20.44

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
NCLH
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $19.95 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • 7 insider purchases totaling $29.2M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.5x is 43% below the historical average of 29.1x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
NCLH
  • Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. scores only 18/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • High leverage (6.54x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
NCLH
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$-1.50B
1.63%
FCF Yield
-15.99%
28.09
Trailing P/E
16.48
25.39
Forward P/E
10.10
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
4.50%
38.88%
ROE
29.53%
60.37%
Gross Margin
43.05%
1.47
PEG Ratio
0.97
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
6.54
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.07
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
GOOGL: 8Ties: 1NCLH: 3
GOOGLNCLH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

NCLH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
NCLH
$3.34
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.00B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
NCLH
90.1% Overvalued
Price is 90.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $20.44
Fair Value: $10.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

NCLH

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
NCLH
18/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
NCLH
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
NCLH
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 98.5%Retail & Other 1.0%
No. of Institutional Holders871
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
NCLH
7
Buys (3M)
14
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $30.93M
PAGLIUCA STEPHEN G
Director
$24.99M
@ $18.11 · 2026-06-02
CHIDSEY JOHN W
Chief Executive Officer
$2.50M
@ $16.37 · 2026-05-22
COHEN JONATHAN Z
Director
$474,900
@ $15.83 · 2026-05-20
CIL JOSE E
Director
$225,350
@ $15.02 · 2026-05-19
MACDONALD BRIAN P
Director
$248,100
@ $16.54 · 2026-05-11
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$521,394
@ $17.69 · 2026-05-07
LANSBERRY KEVIN ALLEN
Director
$196,992
@ $17.28 · 2026-05-07
DAHLGREN PATRIK
Officer
$99,578
@ $17.94 · 2025-11-25
CURTIS HARRY C
Director
$96,250
@ $19.25 · 2025-11-07
MONTAGUE JASON M
Officer
$252,020
@ $18.81 · 2025-11-06
SOMMER HARRY J
Officer and Director
$462,932
@ $18.52 · 2025-11-06
DAVID STELLA JULIE
Director
$129,870
@ $18.59 · 2025-11-06
KEMPA MARK A.
Chief Financial Officer
$197,051
@ $18.53 · 2025-11-06
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$525,335
@ $18.11 · 2025-11-06
BYNG-THORNE ZILLAH
Director
$197,060
@ $24.85 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
NCLH
0
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $110,250
ASHBY FAYE L
Officer
$110,250
@ $21.00 · 2025-12-12
ASHBY FAYE L
Officer
$1.05M
@ $27.30 · 2024-11-08
DEMARCO ANDREA
Officer
$805,057
@ $27.76 · 2024-11-06
KEMPA MARK A.
Chief Financial Officer
$417,918
@ $27.86 · 2024-11-06
FARKAS DANIELS S.
General Counsel
$1.16M
@ $24.72 · 2024-11-04
SOMMER HARRY J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.47M
@ $24.67 · 2024-11-04
FARKAS DANIELS S.
General Counsel
$542,760
@ $18.09 · 2024-08-27
SOMMER HARRY J
Chief Executive Officer
$452,358
@ $18.09 · 2024-08-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
NCLH
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
NCLH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView NCLH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs NCLH

Is Alphabet Inc. or Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NCLH trades at a -90.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $11 vs. price $20), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while NCLH scores 18/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. in financial distress?

NCLH's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.'s -16.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus NCLH's 4.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

GOOGL vs NCLH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io