Compare StocksGOOGL vs MPWR

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. MPWR is overvalued at $1564, with an intrinsic value of $669 and a margin of safety of -134%. Of the two, MPWR has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
$1563.70

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MPWR
  • Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 52.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
MPWR
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 3 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
MPWR
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$663.26M
1.63%
FCF Yield
0.86%
28.09
Trailing P/E
112.17
25.39
Forward P/E
51.85
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
18.95%
38.88%
ROE
19.57%
60.37%
Gross Margin
55.17%
1.47
PEG Ratio
1.97
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.57
0.24%
Dividend Yield
0.53%
GOOGL: 8Ties: 1MPWR: 3
GOOGLMPWR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MPWR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MPWR
$14.25
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$27.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MPWR
100.5% Overvalued
Price is 100.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $1563.70
Fair Value: $779.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

MPWR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1564?

+32.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +31.7%

The market implies +32.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +31.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MPWR
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MPWR
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MPWR
Insiders 3.7%Institutions 101.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MPWR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MPWR
14
Sells (3M)
52
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $703.28M
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$12.86M
@ $1700.00 · 2026-05-27
DEAN ROBERT W II
Chief Financial Officer
$36,290
@ $1649.55 · 2026-05-26
ZHOU JEFFREY
Director
$816,480
@ $1680.00 · 2026-05-26
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$7.93M
@ $1586.43 · 2026-05-22
DEAN ROBERT W II
Chief Financial Officer
$6,253
@ $1563.25 · 2026-05-18
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$18.74M
@ $1561.40 · 2026-05-15
ELMIGER EUGEN J
Director
$19.02M
@ $1584.96 · 2026-05-06
WYNNE EILEEN
Director
$530,198
@ $1582.68 · 2026-05-06
ZHOU JEFFREY
Director
$2.43M
@ $1607.85 · 2026-05-06
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$49.64M
@ $1654.55 · 2026-05-06
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$11.70M
@ $1305.22 · 2026-04-08
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$8.92M
@ $1167.95 · 2026-04-06
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$1.59M
@ $1133.52 · 2026-04-01
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$25.94M
@ $1010.50 · 2026-03-30
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$38.67M
@ $1171.83 · 2026-02-12
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$39.23M
@ $1188.92 · 2026-02-11
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$38.84M
@ $1142.28 · 2026-02-10
LEE VICTOR K
Director
$484,864
@ $1212.16 · 2026-02-09
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$64.32M
@ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$26.79M
@ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$25.44M
@ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$26.79M
@ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$26.79M
@ $1171.16 · 2026-02-06
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$3.39M
@ $1129.76 · 2026-02-02
LEE VICTOR K
Director
$558,516
@ $930.86 · 2026-01-02
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.82M
@ $940.47 · 2026-01-02
LEE VICTOR K
Director
$951,719
@ $951.72 · 2025-12-24
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.72M
@ $908.21 · 2025-12-01
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$18.53M
@ $926.47 · 2025-11-26
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$89,697
@ $896.97 · 2025-11-25
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$18.08M
@ $904.18 · 2025-11-25
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$3.56M
@ $895.23 · 2025-11-24
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$87,397
@ $873.97 · 2025-11-21
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$6.12M
@ $870.21 · 2025-11-19
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$24.66M
@ $881.66 · 2025-11-19
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$35.72M
@ $965.52 · 2025-11-12
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$38.34M
@ $958.39 · 2025-11-11
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$3.07M
@ $1024.43 · 2025-11-03
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$1.41M
@ $1087.62 · 2025-10-24
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$17.14M
@ $1017.77 · 2025-10-16
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.74M
@ $913.22 · 2025-10-01
MARTINEZ CARINTIA
Director
$1.26M
@ $900.00 · 2025-09-18
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$13.27M
@ $914.45 · 2025-09-18
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.44M
@ $814.34 · 2025-09-02
ELMIGER EUGEN J
Director
$3.39M
@ $846.71 · 2025-08-29
ZHOU JEFFREY
Director
$167,910
@ $870.00 · 2025-08-27
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$16.77M
@ $829.10 · 2025-08-15
ZHOU JEFFREY
Director
$340,000
@ $850.00 · 2025-08-13
ZHOU JEFFREY
Director
$166,000
@ $830.00 · 2025-08-12
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.25M
@ $750.00 · 2025-08-01
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$31.20M
@ $780.00 · 2025-08-01
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$4.50M
@ $750.00 · 2025-07-01
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$36,900
@ $738.00 · 2025-05-13
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$69,800
@ $698.00 · 2025-05-12
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$65,000
@ $650.00 · 2025-05-08
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.64M
@ $700.00 · 2025-02-18
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.86M
@ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$474,721
@ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$381,498
@ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$475,438
@ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$474,721
@ $717.10 · 2025-02-10
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$8.37M
@ $700.00 · 2025-02-07
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.55M
@ $700.00 · 2025-01-24
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.50M
@ $600.00 · 2024-12-09
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $765.15 · 2024-11-08
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$662,611
@ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$561,620
@ $765.15 · 2024-11-08
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$662,611
@ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$662,611
@ $765.14 · 2024-11-08
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.93M
@ $772.96 · 2024-11-01
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$10.23M
@ $929.59 · 2024-10-07
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.27M
@ $908.36 · 2024-10-01
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.26M
@ $904.20 · 2024-09-03
CHANG KUO WEI HERBERT
Director
$178,688
@ $893.44 · 2024-08-15
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.53M
@ $827.18 · 2024-08-09
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.17M
@ $778.39 · 2024-08-08
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$668,637
@ $778.39 · 2024-08-08
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$566,668
@ $778.39 · 2024-08-08
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$668,637
@ $778.39 · 2024-08-08
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$668,637
@ $778.39 · 2024-08-08
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.13M
@ $852.51 · 2024-08-01
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$7.99M
@ $831.58 · 2024-07-22
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$2.67M
@ $831.58 · 2024-07-22
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.15M
@ $831.58 · 2024-07-22
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$2.67M
@ $831.58 · 2024-07-22
XIAO DEMING
Officer
$2.67M
@ $831.58 · 2024-07-22
SCIAMMAS MAURICE
Officer
$9.28M
@ $843.83 · 2024-07-08
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$1.53M
@ $824.65 · 2024-07-02
HSING MICHAEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.15M
@ $804.57 · 2024-07-01
BLEGEN THEODORE
Chief Financial Officer
$2.01M
@ $804.19 · 2024-07-01
TSENG SARIA H
General Counsel
$29.98M
@ $808.20 · 2024-07-01
LEE VICTOR K
Director
$820,460
@ $820.46 · 2024-06-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MPWR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
MPWR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView MPWR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs MPWR

Is Alphabet Inc. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MPWR trades at a -133.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $669 vs. price $1564), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while MPWR scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MPWR scores 42.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus MPWR's 18.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s?

MPWR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). MPWR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.