Compare StocksGOOGL vs MNST

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$77.12

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MNST
  • Monster Beverage Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Monster Beverage Corporation scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 42.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
MNST
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
MNST
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.51B
1.57%
FCF Yield
2.01%
29.42
Trailing P/E
39.75
27.06
Forward P/E
30.42
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
24.67%
27.61%
ROE
23.09%
60.37%
Gross Margin
55.85%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.60
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.02
0.22%
Dividend Yield
N/A
GOOGL: 6Ties: 1MNST: 4
GOOGLMNST

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

MNST

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MNST
$4.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$5.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$21.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MNST
31.8% Overvalued
Price is 31.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $77.12
Fair Value: $58.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

MNST

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $77?

+16.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.6%

The market implies +16.5% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +19.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MNST
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MNST
-2.05
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MNST
Insiders 28.5%Institutions 68.7%Retail & Other 2.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,758
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MNST
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MNST
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.67M
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$617,760
@ $77.22 · 2026-03-13
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$2.20M
@ $73.31 · 2025-12-12
CARLING GUY
Officer
$2.74M
@ $71.33 · 2025-11-13
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$637,300
@ $63.73 · 2025-08-13
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.71M
@ $63.40 · 2025-05-29
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$549,398
@ $62.46 · 2025-05-16
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$212,170
@ $60.62 · 2025-05-14
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$552,700
@ $55.27 · 2025-03-14
CARLING GUY
Officer
$2.59M
@ $55.02 · 2025-03-14
TIRRE EMELIE
Officer
$5.06M
@ $55.38 · 2025-03-04
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$526,500
@ $52.65 · 2024-12-13
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$562,100
@ $56.21 · 2024-11-12
VIDERGAUZ MARK S
Director
$781,801
@ $51.85 · 2024-06-11
KELLY THOMAS J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.74M
@ $52.25 · 2024-06-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MNST
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
MNST
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView MNST Full Analysis
GOOGL vs MNST: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io