Compare StocksGOOGL vs MDT

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. MDT is fairly valued at $79, with an intrinsic value of $79 and a margin of safety of 0%. Of the two, MDT has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$79.34

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MDT
  • Gross margin of 65.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
MDT

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    MDT
    Valuation
    $73.27B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    1.63%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    28.09
    Trailing P/E
    21.05
    25.39
    Forward P/E
    12.38
    Quality & Moat
    20.98%
    ROIC
    7.92%
    38.88%
    ROE
    9.93%
    60.37%
    Gross Margin
    65.38%
    1.47
    PEG Ratio
    1.60
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.40
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.19
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.95
    0.24%
    Dividend Yield
    3.54%
    GOOGL: 5Ties: 1MDT: 4
    GOOGLMDT

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MDT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MDT
    $16.10
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.23B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$19.72B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    289.6% Overvalued
    Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.03
    Fair Value: $94.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MDT
    0.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 0.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $79.34
    Fair Value: $79.42
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

    +22.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    MDT

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MDT
    65/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MDT
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,263
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MDT
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 10.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,027
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MDT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $462,750
    JELLISON WILLIAM R
    Director
    $462,750
    @ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MDT
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $9.32M
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $336,965
    @ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $5.13M
    @ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
    SMITH GREGORY L
    Officer
    $3.06M
    @ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
    KIIL HARRY SKIP
    Officer
    $788,048
    @ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
    WALL BRETT A
    Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
    WALL BRETT A
    Officer
    $792,038
    @ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MDT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(47/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    MDT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs MDT

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MDT trades at a 0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $79 vs. price $79), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Medtronic plc?

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDT scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Medtronic plc?

    GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus MDT's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Medtronic plc's?

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDT's 49/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.