Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs MCK

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs McKesson Corporation (MCK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. MCK is fairly valued at $995, with an intrinsic value of $1161 and a margin of safety of 14%. Of the two, MCK has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$994.58

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MCK
  • ★McKesson Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★McKesson Corporation scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.

Risks

GOOGL
    MCK
    • ⚠Gross margin of 3.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 5.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • ⚠18 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    MCK
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $6.80B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    5.87%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    26.66
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    19.64
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    37.10%
    44.29%
    ROE
    N/A
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    3.63%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    1.87
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    N/A
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.94
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    0.38%
    GOOGL: 5Ties: 1MCK: 4
    GOOGLMCK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    MCK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    MCK
    $5.63
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $10.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.38B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    MCK
    14.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 14.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $994.58
    Fair Value: $1161.24
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    MCK

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $995?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

    Standard FCF implies +6.3%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    MCK
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    MCK
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    MCK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 6.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,733
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    MCK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    MCK
    3
    Sells (3M)
    18
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $29.07M
    FRAGA FRANCISCO
    Chief Technology Officer
    $797,129
    @ $996.41 · 2026-10-15
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $98,951
    @ $891.45 · 2026-09-08
    LERMAN BRADLEY E
    Director
    $268,590
    @ $892.33 · 2026-08-10
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.72M
    @ $793.56 · 2026-07-07
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.56M
    @ $775.13 · 2026-06-17
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.76M
    @ $763.00 · 2026-06-09
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $101,612
    @ $764.00 · 2026-06-05
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $604,420
    @ $735.30 · 2026-06-02
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $1.33M
    @ $735.50 · 2026-06-01
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $1.82M
    @ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $761.09 · 2026-05-26
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $2.70M
    @ $990.00 · 2026-03-02
    MARTINEZ MARIA N.
    Director
    $328,013
    @ $939.87 · 2026-02-19
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $179,550
    @ $945.00 · 2026-02-17
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $282,817
    @ $933.39 · 2026-02-11
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $313,240
    @ $955.00 · 2026-02-06
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $225,266
    @ $816.18 · 2026-01-05
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $283,476
    @ $861.63 · 2025-11-07
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.42M
    @ $705.63 · 2025-08-22
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.09M
    @ $677.76 · 2025-08-15
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $218,347
    @ $663.67 · 2025-08-08
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.72M
    @ $708.09 · 2025-07-11
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.67M
    @ $705.93 · 2025-06-06
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $712.18 · 2025-05-30
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $68,201
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $244,807
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    RODGERS THOMAS L
    Officer
    $366,134
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.35M
    @ $717.91 · 2025-05-28
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $749,360
    @ $714.36 · 2025-05-27
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $115,154
    @ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $523,556
    @ $715.24 · 2025-05-23
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $895,190
    @ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
    VITALONE BRITT J
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.54M
    @ $717.30 · 2025-05-22
    RUTLEDGE NAPOLEON B JR
    Officer
    $394,495
    @ $726.51 · 2025-05-19
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.68M
    @ $634.24 · 2025-03-06
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.59M
    @ $624.00 · 2025-02-28
    LAU MICHELE
    Officer
    $188,760
    @ $605.00 · 2025-02-25
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.36M
    @ $597.99 · 2025-02-21
    TYLER BRIAN SCOTT
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.38M
    @ $600.66 · 2025-02-14
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $114,603
    @ $609.59 · 2025-02-12
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $331,645
    @ $572.79 · 2025-01-02
    SMITH LEANN B
    Officer
    $349,027
    @ $602.81 · 2024-12-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    MCK
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(67/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    MCK
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView MCK Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs MCK

    Is Alphabet Inc. or McKesson Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, MCK trades at a 14.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1161 vs. price $995), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or McKesson Corporation?▼

    MCK scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MCK scores 6.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or McKesson Corporation?▼

    McKesson Corporation (MCK) generates a 5.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or McKesson Corporation?▼

    MCK earns 37.1% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or McKesson Corporation's?▼

    MCK's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). MCK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs MCK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io