Compare StocksGOOGL vs MAR

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Marriott International (MAR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GOOGL is overvalued at $356, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of -250%. MAR is undervalued at $373, with an intrinsic value of $57570159845 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, MAR has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$356.13
VS
MAR
Marriott International
$372.83

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MAR
  • Marriott International has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Marriott International scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
MAR
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.32 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Trailing P/E of 39.1x is 44% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.20 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
MAR
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$2.61B
1.68%
FCF Yield
0.00%
17.86
Trailing P/E
39.08
24.17
Forward P/E
28.43
Quality & Moat
15.75%
ROIC
19.24%
48.68%
ROE
N/A
60.90%
Gross Margin
79.04%
0.97
PEG Ratio
2.20
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.58
0.25%
Dividend Yield
0.78%
GOOGL: 6Ties: 1MAR: 3
GOOGLMAR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MAR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MAR
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$6.07B
Δ Market Cap
+$161.35
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
250.3% Overvalued
Price is 250.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $356.13
Fair Value: $101.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MAR
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $372.83
Fair Value: $57570159845.37
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $356?

+22.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

MAR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $373?

-8.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -8.1%

The market implies -8.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -8.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MAR
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MAR
-2.56
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,325
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MAR
Insiders 17.9%Institutions 64.2%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,183
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MAR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MAR
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MAR
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
MAR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView MAR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs MAR

Is Alphabet Inc. or Marriott International more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MAR trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $57570159845 vs. price $373), compared to GOOGL's -250.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $356).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Marriott International?

MAR scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Marriott International in financial distress?

MAR's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Marriott International?

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) generates a 1.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Marriott International's 0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Marriott International?

MAR earns 19.2% ROIC versus GOOGL's 15.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Marriott International's?

MAR's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). MAR has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.