Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs LH

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. LH is overvalued at $361, with an intrinsic value of $187 and a margin of safety of -93%. Of the two, LH has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$361.39

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
LH

    Risks

    GOOGL
      LH
      • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
      • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      LH
      Valuation
      $-1.16B
      Free Cash Flow
      $1.06B
      -0.03%
      FCF Yield
      3.60%
      14.61
      Trailing P/E
      29.62
      18.49
      Forward P/E
      18.45
      Quality & Moat
      14.30%
      ROIC
      8.00%
      44.29%
      ROE
      11.44%
      60.86%
      Gross Margin
      28.96%
      0.98
      PEG Ratio
      1.60
      Balance Sheet Safety
      Net cash
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.74
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      -0.62
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.81
      0.31%
      Dividend Yield
      0.80%
      GOOGL: 7Ties: 2LH: 3
      GOOGLLH

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      GOOGL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      LH

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      $9.18
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $288.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$2.65T
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      LH
      $2.13
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $1.30B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$2.78B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      3447.8% Overvalued
      Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $279.84
      Fair Value: $7.89
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      LH
      93.0% Overvalued
      Price is 93.0% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $361.39
      Fair Value: $187.29
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      GOOGL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      LH

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $361?

      +14.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +14.9%

      The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      89/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      LH
      52/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      -2.92
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      LH
      -2.55
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
      No. of Institutional Holders7,451
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      LH
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 101.5%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,461
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      LH
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      No open market insider sales found.
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      LH
      3
      Sells (3M)
      19
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $11.92M
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $954,060
      @ $318.02 · 2026-08-17
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $320.37 · 2026-08-11
      SUMMY AMY B
      Officer
      $283,428
      @ $306.74 · 2026-08-04
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $439,107
      @ $309.23 · 2026-08-03
      KYLE KATHRYN W
      Officer
      $26,329
      @ $286.18 · 2026-07-02
      VAUGHN BRYAN T
      Officer
      $66,968
      @ $286.19 · 2026-07-02
      KYLE KATHRYN W
      Officer
      $201,084
      @ $263.89 · 2026-06-08
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $254.50 · 2026-05-11
      MELTZER JONATHAN C
      Officer
      $224,055
      @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $436,093
      @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.44M
      @ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
      VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
      Officer
      $156,000
      @ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
      CAVENEY BRIAN J
      Officer
      $429,458
      @ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $185,108
      @ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
      MELTZER JONATHAN C
      Officer
      $25,267
      @ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
      MELTZER JONATHAN C
      Officer
      $25,188
      @ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
      MELTZER JONATHAN C
      Officer
      $24,247
      @ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.51M
      @ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
      PARHAM RICHELLE P
      Director
      $1.78M
      @ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
      VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
      Officer
      $1.06M
      @ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.51M
      @ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
      GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
      Director
      $529,900
      @ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $52,727
      @ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $980,000
      @ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $132,500
      @ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $130,000
      @ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
      CAVENEY BRIAN J
      Officer
      $494,000
      @ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.52M
      @ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
      VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
      Officer
      $452,884
      @ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $200,838
      @ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
      SCHROEDER MARK S
      Chief Operating Officer
      $610,450
      @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
      SUMMY AMY B
      Officer
      $175,606
      @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $127,817
      @ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
      SCHROEDER MARK S
      President
      $1.33M
      @ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
      VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
      Officer
      $330,208
      @ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
      SUMMY AMY B
      Officer
      $56,590
      @ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
      WILKINSON PETER J
      Officer
      $347,739
      @ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
      ANDERSON KERRII B
      Director
      $235,000
      @ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
      EISENBERG GLENN A
      Officer
      $2.82M
      @ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
      GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
      Director
      $241,000
      @ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
      SUMMY AMY B
      Officer
      $877,142
      @ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
      VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
      Officer
      $239,419
      @ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
      SCHECHTER ADAM H
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.51M
      @ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(23/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      LH
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(71/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      GOOGL
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
      LH
      ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (71)
      View GOOGL Full AnalysisView LH Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs LH

      Is Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, LH trades at a -93.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $187 vs. price $361), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?▼

      GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while LH scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

      GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LH scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?▼

      Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) generates a 3.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?▼

      GOOGL earns 14.3% ROIC versus LH's 8.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Labcorp Holdings Inc.'s?▼

      LH's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). LH has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

      GOOGL vs LH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io