Compare StocksGOOGL vs LH

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$255.84

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
LH
  • PEG ratio of 0.69 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
LH
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $5.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
LH
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.14B
1.57%
FCF Yield
5.43%
29.42
Trailing P/E
22.68
27.06
Forward P/E
13.16
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
7.65%
27.61%
ROE
10.02%
60.37%
Gross Margin
28.83%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.69
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.83
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.78
0.22%
Dividend Yield
1.13%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1LH: 4
GOOGLLH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

LH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LH
$2.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LH
62.9% Overvalued
Price is 62.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $255.84
Fair Value: $157.03
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

LH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $256?

+13.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.1%

The market implies +13.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LH
52/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LH
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LH
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 108.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,395
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LH
10
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $15.14M
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$224,055
@ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$436,093
@ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$2.44M
@ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$156,000
@ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$429,458
@ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$185,108
@ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,267
@ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$25,188
@ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
MELTZER JONATHAN C
Officer
$24,247
@ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
PARHAM RICHELLE P
Director
$1.78M
@ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$1.06M
@ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$529,900
@ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$52,727
@ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$980,000
@ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$132,500
@ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$130,000
@ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
CAVENEY BRIAN J
Officer
$494,000
@ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.52M
@ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$200,838
@ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$452,884
@ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
SCHROEDER MARK S
Chief Operating Officer
$610,450
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$175,606
@ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$127,817
@ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
SCHROEDER MARK S
President
$1.33M
@ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$330,208
@ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$56,590
@ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
WILKINSON PETER J
Officer
$347,739
@ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$235,000
@ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
EISENBERG GLENN A
Officer
$2.82M
@ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
Director
$241,000
@ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
SUMMY AMY B
Officer
$877,142
@ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$239,419
@ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
SCHECHTER ADAM H
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$230,000
@ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$454,100
@ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
EISENBERG GLENN A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.36M
@ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
ANDERSON KERRII B
Director
$225,000
@ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
BERBERIAN LANCE V
Chief Technology Officer
$2.77M
@ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
Officer
$421,655
@ $210.83 · 2024-05-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
LH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView LH Full Analysis