Compare StocksGOOGL vs LH

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. LH is overvalued at $256, with an intrinsic value of $222 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, LH has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$255.82

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
LH

    Risks

    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    LH
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Insiders have sold $2.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 7.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    LH
    Valuation
    $73.27B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.14B
    1.63%
    FCF Yield
    5.45%
    28.09
    Trailing P/E
    22.68
    25.39
    Forward P/E
    13.16
    Quality & Moat
    20.98%
    ROIC
    7.62%
    38.88%
    ROE
    11.05%
    60.37%
    Gross Margin
    28.83%
    1.47
    PEG Ratio
    1.12
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.72
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.19
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.80
    0.24%
    Dividend Yield
    1.09%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 1LH: 5
    GOOGLLH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LH
    $2.13
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.30B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    289.6% Overvalued
    Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.03
    Fair Value: $94.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LH
    15.1% Overvalued
    Price is 15.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $255.82
    Fair Value: $222.29
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

    +22.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    LH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $256?

    +10.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.1%

    The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LH
    52/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LH
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,263
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LH
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 101.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,417
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LH
    4
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $14.70M
    KYLE KATHRYN W
    Officer
    $201,084
    @ $263.89 · 2026-06-08
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $254.50 · 2026-05-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $224,055
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $436,093
    @ $267.05 · 2026-03-27
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.44M
    @ $279.96 · 2026-03-03
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $156,000
    @ $285.19 · 2026-02-27
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $429,458
    @ $286.31 · 2026-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $185,108
    @ $277.94 · 2026-02-19
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,267
    @ $290.43 · 2026-02-12
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $284.38 · 2026-02-11
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $25,188
    @ $276.79 · 2026-02-10
    MELTZER JONATHAN C
    Officer
    $24,247
    @ $275.53 · 2026-02-09
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $262.75 · 2025-11-11
    PARHAM RICHELLE P
    Director
    $1.78M
    @ $254.28 · 2025-10-31
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $1.06M
    @ $271.42 · 2025-08-13
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $266.78 · 2025-08-11
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $529,900
    @ $264.95 · 2025-07-30
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $52,727
    @ $261.02 · 2025-07-29
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $980,000
    @ $280.00 · 2025-07-24
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $132,500
    @ $265.00 · 2025-07-01
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $130,000
    @ $260.00 · 2025-06-11
    CAVENEY BRIAN J
    Officer
    $494,000
    @ $247.00 · 2025-06-03
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.52M
    @ $248.73 · 2025-05-12
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $452,884
    @ $238.36 · 2025-05-01
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $200,838
    @ $242.27 · 2025-05-01
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    Chief Operating Officer
    $610,450
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $175,606
    @ $231.67 · 2025-03-28
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $127,817
    @ $255.63 · 2025-03-05
    SCHROEDER MARK S
    President
    $1.33M
    @ $249.23 · 2025-02-28
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $330,208
    @ $251.30 · 2025-02-25
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $56,590
    @ $250.40 · 2025-02-24
    WILKINSON PETER J
    Officer
    $347,739
    @ $246.10 · 2025-02-18
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $244.62 · 2025-02-11
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $235,000
    @ $235.00 · 2025-01-07
    EISENBERG GLENN A
    Officer
    $2.82M
    @ $240.43 · 2024-12-02
    GILLILAND DWIGHT GARY
    Director
    $241,000
    @ $241.00 · 2024-12-02
    SUMMY AMY B
    Officer
    $877,142
    @ $238.94 · 2024-11-22
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $239,419
    @ $239.42 · 2024-11-21
    SCHECHTER ADAM H
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $243.47 · 2024-11-11
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $230,000
    @ $230.00 · 2024-10-24
    VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD
    Officer
    $454,100
    @ $227.05 · 2024-08-19
    EISENBERG GLENN A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.36M
    @ $223.99 · 2024-08-15
    ANDERSON KERRII B
    Director
    $225,000
    @ $225.00 · 2024-08-08
    BERBERIAN LANCE V
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.77M
    @ $229.10 · 2024-08-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    LH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView LH Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs LH

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, LH trades at a -15.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222 vs. price $256), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while LH scores 52/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LH scores 3.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?

    Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Labcorp Holdings Inc.?

    GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus LH's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Labcorp Holdings Inc.'s?

    LH's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). LH has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs LH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io