SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs KMI

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with a DCF intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. KMI is overvalued at $32, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -326%. Of the two, GOOGL has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03
VS
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$31.59

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
KMI

    Risks

    GOOGL
    • ⚠FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    KMI
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.72 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • ⚠Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 1.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    KMI
    Valuation
    $73.27B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.89B
    1.63%
    FCF Yield
    4.11%
    28.09
    Trailing P/E
    21.20
    25.39
    Forward P/E
    20.96
    Quality & Moat
    20.98%
    ROIC
    6.39%
    38.88%
    ROE
    10.60%
    60.37%
    Gross Margin
    49.45%
    1.47
    PEG Ratio
    3.72
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.99
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.19
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.32
    0.24%
    Dividend Yield
    3.75%
    GOOGL: 7Ties: 1KMI: 4
    GOOGLKMI

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    KMI

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    KMI
    $55.46
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $370.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$20.52B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    289.6% Overvalued
    Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $368.03
    Fair Value: $94.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    KMI
    326.1% Overvalued
    Price is 326.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $31.59
    Fair Value: $7.41
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

    +22.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    KMI

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

    +15.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    KMI
    32/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    KMI
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,263
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    KMI
    Insiders 12.7%Institutions 70.9%Retail & Other 16.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,273
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    KMI
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.24M
    SMITH WILLIAM A
    Director
    $89,236
    @ $29.75 · 2026-02-02
    CHRONIS AMY W
    Director
    $112,443
    @ $26.23 · 2025-10-31
    KINDER RICHARD D
    Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
    $25.96M
    @ $25.96 · 2025-10-27
    CHRONIS AMY W
    Director
    $75,059
    @ $27.21 · 2025-07-28
    CHRONIS AMY W
    Director
    $55,790
    @ $24.90 · 2024-11-05
    CHRONIS AMY W
    Director
    $200,986
    @ $20.65 · 2024-08-02
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    KMI
    5
    Sells (3M)
    20
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $6.90M
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $196,264
    @ $31.83 · 2026-06-05
    GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
    Officer
    $52,151
    @ $33.65 · 2026-05-18
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $199,840
    @ $32.41 · 2026-05-05
    GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
    Divisional Officer
    $49,168
    @ $31.72 · 2026-04-16
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $203,071
    @ $32.93 · 2026-04-06
    GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
    Officer
    $51,609
    @ $33.30 · 2026-03-16
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $207,640
    @ $33.67 · 2026-03-05
    ASHLEY ANTHONY B
    Officer
    $255,560
    @ $31.95 · 2026-02-17
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $185,523
    @ $30.09 · 2026-02-05
    MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
    Chief Financial Officer
    $600,000
    @ $30.00 · 2026-01-22
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $169,491
    @ $27.49 · 2026-01-05
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $171,476
    @ $27.81 · 2025-12-05
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $166,482
    @ $27.00 · 2025-11-10
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $173,709
    @ $28.17 · 2025-10-06
    GRAHMANN KEVIN P
    Officer
    $658,908
    @ $27.61 · 2025-09-15
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $166,482
    @ $27.00 · 2025-09-08
    SANDERS DAX A
    Officer
    $814,999
    @ $27.05 · 2025-08-11
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $171,446
    @ $27.81 · 2025-08-05
    MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $28.19 · 2025-08-04
    MODY SITAL K
    Officer
    $1.27M
    @ $27.96 · 2025-08-01
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $508,676
    @ $28.26 · 2025-06-04
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $496,255
    @ $27.57 · 2025-05-07
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $479,018
    @ $26.61 · 2025-03-05
    SCHLOSSER JOHN W
    Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $26.65 · 2025-02-18
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $498,521
    @ $27.70 · 2025-02-05
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $502,294
    @ $27.91 · 2025-01-02
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $492,079
    @ $27.34 · 2024-12-04
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $502,530
    @ $26.28 · 2024-11-06
    SANDERS DAX A
    Officer
    $1.11M
    @ $21.00 · 2024-08-14
    MARTIN THOMAS A
    President
    $2.10M
    @ $21.01 · 2024-08-01
    MODY SITAL K
    Officer
    $529,553
    @ $21.04 · 2024-08-01
    MODY SITAL K
    Officer
    $455,078
    @ $21.25 · 2024-07-24
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(58/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    KMI
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(59/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
    KMI
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView KMI Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs KMI

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Kinder Morgan, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, GOOGL trades at a -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $94 vs. price $368), compared to KMI's -326.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $32).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Kinder Morgan, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while KMI scores 32/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Kinder Morgan, Inc. in financial distress?▼

    KMI's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Kinder Morgan, Inc.?▼

    Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) generates a 4.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Kinder Morgan, Inc.?▼

    GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus KMI's 6.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to KMI's 34/100 (Unsafe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.