Compare StocksGOOGL vs KMI

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$383.58
VS
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$32.28

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
KMI
  • PEG ratio of 0.60 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
KMI
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 6 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
KMI
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$2.89B
1.58%
FCF Yield
4.02%
29.26
Trailing P/E
21.67
26.91
Forward P/E
21.46
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
6.39%
27.61%
ROE
9.38%
60.37%
Gross Margin
49.45%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.60
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.99
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.32
0.22%
Dividend Yield
3.61%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1KMI: 4
GOOGLKMI

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

KMI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
KMI
$55.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$370.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$20.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
239.9% Overvalued
Price is 239.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $383.58
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
KMI
245.6% Overvalued
Price is 245.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $32.28
Fair Value: $9.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $384?

+23.4%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

KMI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $32?

+15.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
KMI
32/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
KMI
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
KMI
Insiders 12.8%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 17.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,185
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
KMI
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.24M
SMITH WILLIAM A
Director
$89,236
@ $29.75 · 2026-02-02
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$112,443
@ $26.23 · 2025-10-31
KINDER RICHARD D
Officer, Director and Beneficial Owner
$25.96M
@ $25.96 · 2025-10-27
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$75,059
@ $27.21 · 2025-07-28
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$55,790
@ $24.90 · 2024-11-05
CHRONIS AMY W
Director
$200,986
@ $20.65 · 2024-08-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
KMI
6
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.45M
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Divisional Officer
$49,168
@ $31.72 · 2026-04-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$203,071
@ $32.93 · 2026-04-06
GARTHWAITE MICHAEL P
Officer
$51,609
@ $33.30 · 2026-03-16
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$207,640
@ $33.67 · 2026-03-05
ASHLEY ANTHONY B
Officer
$255,560
@ $31.95 · 2026-02-17
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$185,523
@ $30.09 · 2026-02-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$600,000
@ $30.00 · 2026-01-22
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$169,491
@ $27.49 · 2026-01-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,476
@ $27.81 · 2025-12-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-11-10
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$173,709
@ $28.17 · 2025-10-06
GRAHMANN KEVIN P
Officer
$658,908
@ $27.61 · 2025-09-15
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$166,482
@ $27.00 · 2025-09-08
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$814,999
@ $27.05 · 2025-08-11
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$171,446
@ $27.81 · 2025-08-05
MICHELS DAVID PATRICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $28.19 · 2025-08-04
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$1.27M
@ $27.96 · 2025-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$508,676
@ $28.26 · 2025-06-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$496,255
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-07
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$479,018
@ $26.61 · 2025-03-05
SCHLOSSER JOHN W
Officer
$2.01M
@ $26.65 · 2025-02-18
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$498,521
@ $27.70 · 2025-02-05
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,294
@ $27.91 · 2025-01-02
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$492,079
@ $27.34 · 2024-12-04
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$502,530
@ $26.28 · 2024-11-06
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$1.11M
@ $21.00 · 2024-08-14
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$529,553
@ $21.04 · 2024-08-01
MARTIN THOMAS A
President
$2.10M
@ $21.01 · 2024-08-01
MODY SITAL K
Officer
$455,078
@ $21.25 · 2024-07-24
SANDERS DAX A
Officer
$987,515
@ $19.75 · 2024-05-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
KMI
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
KMI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView KMI Full Analysis
GOOGL vs KMI: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io