Compare StocksGOOGL vs J

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
J
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
$128.92

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
J
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.50 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
J
  • Gross margin of 24.4% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
J
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.09B
1.57%
FCF Yield
7.19%
29.42
Trailing P/E
34.02
27.06
Forward P/E
16.07
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
9.70%
27.61%
ROE
6.37%
60.37%
Gross Margin
24.45%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.50
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.65
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.10
0.22%
Dividend Yield
1.12%
GOOGL: 8Ties: 1J: 3
GOOGLJ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

J

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
J
$2.33
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.34B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.12B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
J
120.4% Overvalued
Price is 120.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $128.92
Fair Value: $58.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

J

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $129?

+22.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.0%

The market implies +22.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
J
62/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
J
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
J
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 91.9%Retail & Other 7.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,246
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
J
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $353,366
ROBERTSON PETER J
Director
$134,760
@ $134.76 · 2025-11-24
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$99,785
@ $130.78 · 2025-11-24
NATHAMUNI VENKATESH
Chief Financial Officer
$101,332
@ $135.11 · 2025-11-24
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$17,489
@ $120.61 · 2025-05-08
FERNANDEZ MANUEL J
Director
$33,646
@ $123.70 · 2025-03-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
J
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $193,147
MILLER SHANNON
President
$193,147
@ $134.13 · 2026-03-06
THOMPSON CHRISTOPHER M T
Director
$286,320
@ $150.85 · 2024-08-29
EBERHART RALPH EDWARD
Director
$286,288
@ $150.12 · 2024-08-29
GUSTAFSON SHELETTE M.
Officer
$625,633
@ $150.14 · 2024-08-29
ALLEN WILLIAM B JR
Officer
$212,586
@ $146.51 · 2024-08-16
DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
Officer and Director
$1.03M
@ $146.88 · 2024-08-01
DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
Officer and Director
$979,580
@ $139.94 · 2024-07-01
DEMETRIOU STEVEN J
Officer and Director
$976,010
@ $139.43 · 2024-06-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
J
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
J
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView J Full Analysis
GOOGL vs J: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io