Compare Stocks › GOOGL vs ITW

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with a DCF intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. ITW is overvalued at $279, with an intrinsic value of $197 and a margin of safety of -41%. Of the two, ITW has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84
VS
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
$278.55

Rewards

GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
ITW
  • ★Illinois Tool Works Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Illinois Tool Works Inc. scores 95/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GOOGL
    ITW
    • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.08 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • ⚠FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.70 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ITW
    Valuation
    $-1.16B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.31B
    -0.03%
    FCF Yield
    2.91%
    14.61
    Trailing P/E
    24.85
    18.49
    Forward P/E
    22.56
    Quality & Moat
    14.30%
    ROIC
    29.47%
    44.29%
    ROE
    101.65%
    60.86%
    Gross Margin
    44.32%
    0.98
    PEG Ratio
    2.70
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.73
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.62
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.76
    0.31%
    Dividend Yield
    2.47%
    GOOGL: 6Ties: 1ITW: 5
    GOOGLITW

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    ITW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ITW
    $0.88
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $4.42B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ITW
    41.4% Overvalued
    Price is 41.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $278.55
    Fair Value: $197.01
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    ITW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $279?

    +12.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +16.4%

    The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ITW
    95/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ITW
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ITW
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 12.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,508
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ITW
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $3.56M
    SCANLON JENNIFER F.
    Director
    $199,880
    @ $247.99 · 2026-06-02
    SMITH DAVID BYRON JR.
    Director
    $1.68M
    @ $250.13 · 2025-12-10
    SMITH DAVID BYRON JR.
    Director
    $1.68M
    @ $250.13 · 2025-12-10
    SMITH DAVID BYRON JR.
    Director
    $210,292
    @ $241.16 · 2025-06-02
    SMITH DAVID BYRON JR.
    Director
    $174,752
    @ $275.20 · 2024-12-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ITW
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $67.30M
    SANTI ERNEST SCOTT
    Director
    $11.89M
    @ $287.09 · 2026-08-19
    PIGOZZO MATTEO C.
    Officer
    $80,114
    @ $289.22 · 2026-08-13
    LAWLER MARY KATHERINE
    Officer
    $5.04M
    @ $291.90 · 2026-02-06
    BECK AXEL
    Officer
    $1.23M
    @ $290.22 · 2026-02-05
    SANTI ERNEST SCOTT
    Director
    $48.69M
    @ $290.93 · 2026-02-04
    STROBEL PAMELA B
    Director
    $373,025
    @ $245.25 · 2025-11-05
    SCHEUNEMAN RANDALL J
    Officer
    $1.80M
    @ $265.08 · 2025-09-11
    LARSEN MICHAEL M
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.25M
    @ $271.25 · 2025-03-07
    O HERLIHY CHRISTOPHER A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $13.29M
    @ $274.36 · 2025-03-07
    SANTI ERNEST SCOTT
    Director
    $19.44M
    @ $264.67 · 2025-02-20
    SANTI ERNEST SCOTT
    Director
    $18.43M
    @ $263.30 · 2025-02-19
    LAWLER MARY KATHERINE
    Officer
    $3.18M
    @ $272.95 · 2024-11-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ITW
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    ITW
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View GOOGL Full AnalysisView ITW Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs ITW

    Is Alphabet Inc. or Illinois Tool Works Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ITW trades at a -41.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $197 vs. price $279), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Illinois Tool Works Inc.?▼

    ITW scores 95/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ITW scores 7.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Alphabet Inc. or Illinois Tool Works Inc.?▼

    Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) generates a 2.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Illinois Tool Works Inc.?▼

    ITW earns 29.5% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Illinois Tool Works Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ITW's 69/100 (Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    GOOGL vs ITW: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io