Compare StocksGOOGL vs HST

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GOOGL is overvalued at $356, with a DCF intrinsic value of $102 and a margin of safety of -250%. HST is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $10081055985 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, HST has the wider margin of safety.

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$356.13
VS
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
$25.13

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
HST
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.63 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
HST
  • PEG ratio of 4.14 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.58 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
HST
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$1.19B
1.68%
FCF Yield
N/A
17.86
Trailing P/E
17.10
24.17
Forward P/E
24.69
Quality & Moat
15.75%
ROIC
7.39%
48.68%
ROE
14.87%
60.90%
Gross Margin
28.98%
0.97
PEG Ratio
4.14
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.70
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.36
0.25%
Dividend Yield
3.18%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 3HST: 1
GOOGLHST

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

HST

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HST
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$295.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$1.68
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
250.3% Overvalued
Price is 250.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $356.13
Fair Value: $101.66
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HST
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.13
Fair Value: $10081055985.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $356?

+22.2%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

HST

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -19.0%

The market implies -14.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -19.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HST
62/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HST
-2.64
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.3%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,325
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HST
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 105.2%
No. of Institutional Holders997
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HST
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HST
3
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.98M
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$78,041
@ $22.90 · 2026-05-26
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$358,087
@ $23.00 · 2026-05-26
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$1.29M
@ $22.00 · 2026-05-08
LENTZ MICHAEL E
Officer
$252,826
@ $19.95 · 2026-02-27
TYRRELL NATHAN S
Chief Investment Officer
$384,813
@ $18.29 · 2025-12-12
LENTZ MICHAEL E
Officer
$617,474
@ $17.64 · 2025-11-25
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$71,434
@ $15.38 · 2025-05-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HST
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
HST
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView HST Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GOOGL vs HST

Is Alphabet Inc. or Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HST trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $10081055985 vs. price $25), compared to GOOGL's -250.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $102 vs. $356).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Alphabet Inc. or Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.?

GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while HST scores 62/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. in financial distress?

HST's Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Alphabet Inc. or Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.?

GOOGL earns 15.7% ROIC versus HST's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Alphabet Inc.'s or Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s?

GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to HST's 40/100 (Borderline). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.