Compare StocksGOOGL vs HPQ

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs HP Inc. (HPQ)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13
VS
HPQ
HP Inc.
$18.48

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
HPQ
  • HP Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • HP Inc. scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • FCF yield of 16.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
HPQ
  • Gross margin of 20.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.64 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
HPQ
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$2.83B
1.97%
FCF Yield
16.65%
28.41
Trailing P/E
7.00
22.88
Forward P/E
6.21
Quality & Moat
20.83%
ROIC
25.12%
31.83%
ROE
N/A
59.65%
Gross Margin
20.25%
0.91
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.75
0.27%
Dividend Yield
6.49%
GOOGL: 3Ties: 1HPQ: 5
GOOGLHPQ

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

HPQ

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HPQ
$-1.08
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$5.37B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HPQ
49.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 49.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $18.48
Fair Value: $36.27
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

HPQ

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $18?

-2.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -3.7%

The market implies -2.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -3.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HPQ
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HPQ
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HPQ
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,525
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HPQ
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HPQ
2
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.61M
CITRINO MARY ANNE
Director
$834,327
@ $18.47 · 2026-03-11
PATEL KETAN MAGANLAL
Officer
$772,714
@ $23.19 · 2025-12-26
OLSON ANNELIESE
Officer
$415,307
@ $24.83 · 2025-12-09
LORES ENRIQUE J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.09M
@ $26.01 · 2025-12-05
OLSON ANNELIESE
Officer
$506,134
@ $27.88 · 2025-10-29
LORES ENRIQUE J
Chief Executive Officer
$920,472
@ $26.85 · 2025-09-29
OLSON ANNELIESE
Officer
$613,817
@ $28.49 · 2025-03-27
LIEBMAN STEPHANIE
Officer
$453,734
@ $29.00 · 2025-03-24
LORES ENRIQUE J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.71M
@ $31.08 · 2025-03-03
LIEBMAN STEPHANIE
Officer
$357,500
@ $32.50 · 2024-12-30
LUDGATE KRISTEN MARIE
Officer
$2.56M
@ $34.43 · 2024-12-13
CHO ALEX
Officer
$1.40M
@ $34.80 · 2024-12-11
LORES ENRIQUE J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.00M
@ $36.45 · 2024-12-09
CHO ALEX
Officer
$353,427
@ $34.32 · 2024-11-29
LORES ENRIQUE J
Chief Executive Officer
$7.01M
@ $33.16 · 2024-09-12
CHO ALEX
Officer
$6.25M
@ $36.11 · 2024-06-21
BENNETT ROBERT R
Director
$2.01M
@ $30.01 · 2024-03-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HPQ
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
HPQ
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView HPQ Full Analysis