Compare StocksGOOGL vs HOLX

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Hologic, Inc. (HOLX)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13
VS
HOLX
Hologic, Inc.
$75.33

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
HOLX
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.14 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
HOLX
  • ROIC has declined by 8.4 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 23.2% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
HOLX
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$848.61M
1.97%
FCF Yield
5.05%
28.41
Trailing P/E
31.26
22.88
Forward P/E
15.52
Quality & Moat
20.83%
ROIC
9.65%
31.83%
ROE
10.79%
59.65%
Gross Margin
60.38%
0.91
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.16
Debt / Equity
0.48
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.11
0.27%
Dividend Yield
N/A
GOOGL: 6Ties: 2HOLX: 2
GOOGLHOLX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

HOLX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HOLX
$-1.05
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.81B
Δ Market Cap
$-1.91B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HOLX
24.4% Overvalued
Price is 24.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $75.33
Fair Value: $60.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

HOLX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $75?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.7%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HOLX
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HOLX
-2.70
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HOLX
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 96.5%Retail & Other 2.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,091
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HOLX
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $300,760
MADAUS MARTIN D PH.D.
Director
$300,760
@ $55.24 · 2025-05-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HOLX
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.81M
STAMOULIS CHRISTIANA
Director
$540,864
@ $73.07 · 2025-10-20
MACMILLAN STEPHEN P
Chief Executive Officer
$9.27M
@ $66.97 · 2025-09-22
MITCHELL ESSEX D
Chief Operating Officer
$1.90M
@ $76.34 · 2024-12-04
OBERTON KARLEEN MARIE
Chief Financial Officer
$4.24M
@ $80.56 · 2024-08-29
SCHNITTKER BRANDON
Officer
$39,559
@ $83.11 · 2024-08-06
COHN BENJAMIN JORDAN
Officer
$417,570
@ $81.99 · 2024-08-01
MACMILLAN STEPHEN P
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $81.70 · 2024-07-30
MACMILLAN STEPHEN P
Chief Executive Officer
$294,223
@ $80.13 · 2024-07-17
STAMOULIS CHRISTIANA
Director
$718,600
@ $79.50 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HOLX
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
HOLX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView HOLX Full Analysis