Compare StocksGOOGL vs HII

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) vs Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII)

GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69
VS
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
$360.60

Rewards

GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
HII
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.83 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
HII
  • Gross margin of 12.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.24 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Trailing P/E of 23.4x is 40% above the historical average of 16.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GOOGL
HII
Valuation
$73.27B
Free Cash Flow
$686.00M
1.57%
FCF Yield
4.83%
29.42
Trailing P/E
23.42
27.06
Forward P/E
17.72
Quality & Moat
20.98%
ROIC
7.26%
27.61%
ROE
11.93%
60.37%
Gross Margin
12.70%
0.36
PEG Ratio
0.83
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Debt / Equity
0.59
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.19
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.95
0.22%
Dividend Yield
1.53%
GOOGL: 7Ties: 1HII: 4
GOOGLHII

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

HII

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
HII
$3.40
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.22B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GOOGL
241.8% Overvalued
Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $385.69
Fair Value: $112.84
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
HII
28.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 28.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $360.60
Fair Value: $507.17
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

+23.5%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

HII

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $361?

+11.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.1%

The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
HII
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
HII
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,168
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
HII
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 95.9%Retail & Other 3.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,092
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
HII
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $954,730
STANAGE NICKIE LEE
Director
$954,730
@ $272.78 · 2025-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
HII
5
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.93M
STIEHLE THOMAS E.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $430.54 · 2026-03-06
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$1.86M
@ $422.45 · 2026-03-05
CHEWNING ERIC D
Officer
$736,848
@ $433.44 · 2026-03-04
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$2.04M
@ $457.83 · 2026-03-02
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$786,711
@ $457.39 · 2026-03-02
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$247,216
@ $314.52 · 2025-11-26
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$268,124
@ $315.44 · 2025-11-20
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$316,605
@ $316.61 · 2025-11-04
SCHUCK NICOLAS GERARD
Officer
$146,389
@ $314.82 · 2025-11-04
HARKER VICTORIA D
Director
$268,630
@ $268.63 · 2025-08-05
GREEN EDGAR ANDY III
Officer
$1.12M
@ $265.67 · 2025-08-04
BOUDREAUX CHAD N.
Officer
$449,873
@ $228.94 · 2025-06-03
HUGHES EDMOND E. JR.
Officer
$301,483
@ $231.91 · 2025-05-07
KELLY ANASTASI D
Director
$455,857
@ $232.58 · 2025-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GOOGL
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
HII
FearGreed
😐Neutral(42/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
HII
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
View GOOGL Full AnalysisView HII Full Analysis
GOOGL vs HII: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io