Compare Stocks › COST vs GOOGL

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, COST is overvalued at $1012, with a DCF intrinsic value of $525 and a margin of safety of -93%. GOOGL is overvalued at $280, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -3448%. Of the two, COST has the wider margin of safety.

COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$1012.28
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$279.84

Rewards

COST
  • ★Costco Wholesale Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Costco Wholesale Corporation scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 11.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GOOGL
  • ★Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 60.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

COST
  • ⚠Gross margin of 12.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
GOOGL

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COST
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $9.38B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-1.16B
    2.09%
    FCF Yield
    -0.03%
    48.76
    Trailing P/E
    14.61
    40.45
    Forward P/E
    18.49
    Quality & Moat
    19.73%
    ROIC
    14.30%
    28.40%
    ROE
    44.29%
    12.77%
    Gross Margin
    60.86%
    5.07
    PEG Ratio
    0.98
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.78
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.62
    0.58%
    Dividend Yield
    0.31%
    COST: 6Ties: 1GOOGL: 5
    COSTGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COST

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COST
    $14.21
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.01B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$156.43B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COST
    92.6% Overvalued
    Price is 92.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $1012.28
    Fair Value: $525.49
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    3447.8% Overvalued
    Price is 3447.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $279.84
    Fair Value: $7.89
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COST

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1012?

    +19.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +19.2%

    The market implies +19.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +19.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    GOOGL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COST
    96/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COST
    -2.64
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COST
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 74.3%Retail & Other 25.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,172
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 1.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 17.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,451
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COST
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COST
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $13.25M
    WILCOX WILLIAM RICHARD
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $958.21 · 2026-10-13
    FRATES CATON
    Officer
    $733,328
    @ $916.66 · 2026-09-29
    ADAMO CLAUDINE
    Officer
    $2.02M
    @ $915.93 · 2026-09-29
    DENMAN KENNETH D
    Director
    $847,345
    @ $957.45 · 2026-06-23
    FRATES CATON
    Officer
    $695,100
    @ $993.00 · 2026-04-01
    ADAMO CLAUDINE
    Officer
    $732,205
    @ $1003.02 · 2026-03-09
    JONES TERESA A
    Officer
    $838,318
    @ $986.26 · 2026-01-21
    DECKER SUSAN LYNNE
    Director
    $437,390
    @ $955.00 · 2026-01-16
    KLAUER JAMES C
    Officer
    $1.41M
    @ $939.00 · 2026-01-14
    POLIT JAVIER
    Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $866.38 · 2025-12-30
    WILCOX WILLIAM RICHARD
    Officer
    $2.23M
    @ $930.13 · 2025-11-07
    BARBRE TIFFANY MARIE
    Divisional Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $934.91 · 2025-10-24
    ADAMO CLAUDINE
    Officer
    $2.53M
    @ $935.68 · 2025-10-24
    FRATES CATON
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $910.02 · 2025-09-29
    JONES TERESA A
    Officer
    $595,230
    @ $992.05 · 2025-08-20
    RUBANENKO YORAM B.
    Officer
    $3.90M
    @ $974.96 · 2025-07-14
    DECKER SUSAN LYNNE
    Director
    $536,058
    @ $980.00 · 2025-06-18
    CALLANS PATRICK J
    Officer
    $3.01M
    @ $1002.77 · 2025-06-09
    RIEL PIERRE
    Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $1014.15 · 2025-06-06
    KLAUER JAMES C
    Officer
    $3.92M
    @ $981.07 · 2025-04-17
    MILLERCHIP GARY
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $940.01 · 2025-03-27
    ADAMO CLAUDINE
    Officer
    $830,304
    @ $922.56 · 2025-03-24
    FRATES CATON
    Officer
    $765,213
    @ $900.25 · 2025-03-18
    VACHRIS ROLAND MICHAEL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.35M
    @ $931.00 · 2025-03-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COST
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COST
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    GOOGL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    View COST Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COST vs GOOGL

    Is Costco Wholesale Corporation or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, COST trades at a -92.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $525 vs. price $1012), compared to GOOGL's -3447.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $280).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Costco Wholesale Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    COST scores 96/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Alphabet Inc. in financial distress?▼

    GOOGL's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COST scores 9.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Costco Wholesale Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) generates a 2.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s -0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Costco Wholesale Corporation or Alphabet Inc.?▼

    COST earns 19.7% ROIC versus GOOGL's 14.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Costco Wholesale Corporation's or Alphabet Inc.'s?▼

    GOOGL's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to COST's 88/100 (Very Safe). GOOGL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    COST vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io