Compare StocksGM vs MS

General Motors Company (GM) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GM is fairly valued at $89, with a DCF intrinsic value of $99 and a margin of safety of 10%. MS is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

GM
General Motors Company
$88.86
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42

Rewards

GM
  • Share count has been reduced by 35% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 27.3% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.35 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GM
  • Gross margin of 10.2% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • General Motors Company scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Trailing P/E of 39.7x is 269% above the historical average of 10.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GM
MS
Valuation
$21.93B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
27.29%
FCF Yield
N/A
39.67
Trailing P/E
17.01
6.04
Forward P/E
15.45
Quality & Moat
2.44%
ROIC
3.68%
3.16%
ROE
14.08%
10.18%
Gross Margin
87.64%
0.35
PEG Ratio
1.99
Balance Sheet Safety
1.63
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.81%
Dividend Yield
2.19%
GM: 2Ties: 1MS: 6
GMMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GM
$1.56
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$16.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$26.42B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GM
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $88.86
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $89?

+24.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -4.3%

The market implies +24.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GM
27/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GM
-2.36
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GM
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,052
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
KELLY ALFRED FRANCIS JR.
Director
$607,920
@ $50.66 · 2025-01-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GM
12
Sells (3M)
25
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $228.55M
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$37.69M
@ $89.13 · 2026-07-28
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$620,550
@ $90.00 · 2026-07-28
REUSS MARK L
President
$6.39M
@ $89.97 · 2026-07-28
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$772,290
@ $86.95 · 2026-07-27
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$8.45M
@ $85.10 · 2026-06-16
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.75M
@ $85.00 · 2026-06-09
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.96M
@ $85.00 · 2026-05-29
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$775,266
@ $84.97 · 2026-05-28
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$37.19M
@ $82.03 · 2026-05-28
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$586,075
@ $85.00 · 2026-05-28
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$7.05M
@ $82.79 · 2026-05-27
JACOBSON PAUL A
Chief Financial Officer
$3.20M
@ $80.00 · 2026-05-26
REUSS MARK L
President
$38.71M
@ $80.52 · 2026-02-17
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$556,128
@ $72.00 · 2025-11-12
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.10M
@ $70.00 · 2025-10-28
REUSS MARK L
President
$17.32M
@ $66.45 · 2025-10-22
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$408,870
@ $61.95 · 2025-09-26
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$1.43M
@ $61.01 · 2025-09-26
REUSS MARK L
President
$9.80M
@ $60.10 · 2025-09-25
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$46.61M
@ $59.95 · 2025-09-24
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$267,317
@ $59.95 · 2025-09-12
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$1.77M
@ $59.92 · 2025-09-12
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$865,353
@ $59.00 · 2025-08-27
HATTO CHRISTOPHER
Officer
$2.03M
@ $55.10 · 2025-08-13
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$1.27M
@ $53.01 · 2025-08-05
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$535,229
@ $60.01 · 2024-11-25
GLIDDEN CRAIG B
General Counsel
$21.70M
@ $56.63 · 2024-11-18
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$11.91M
@ $57.60 · 2024-11-11
REUSS MARK L
President
$6.75M
@ $55.16 · 2024-11-06
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$502,671
@ $54.01 · 2024-10-23
BARRA MARY TERESA
Chief Executive Officer
$27.03M
@ $53.33 · 2024-10-23
HARVEY RORY
Officer
$736,061
@ $48.76 · 2024-08-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GM
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View GM Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GM vs MS

Is General Motors Company or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $269 vs. price $210), compared to GM's 10.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $99 vs. $89).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, General Motors Company or Morgan Stanley?

MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while GM scores 27/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GM scores 1.2 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, General Motors Company or Morgan Stanley?

MS earns 3.7% ROIC versus GM's 2.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, General Motors Company's or Morgan Stanley's?

GM's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). GM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.