Compare StocksGLW vs UNH

Corning Incorporated (GLW) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GLW is overvalued at $195, with a DCF intrinsic value of $137 and a margin of safety of -42%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

GLW
Corning Incorporated
$194.92
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

GLW
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.04 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GLW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 98.9x is 106% above the historical average of 48.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GLW
UNH
Valuation
$1.41B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
0.84%
FCF Yield
4.86%
98.94
Trailing P/E
30.17
46.55
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
9.07%
ROIC
15.60%
16.74%
ROE
12.18%
36.38%
Gross Margin
18.80%
1.39
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.66
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.09
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.63%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
GLW: 2Ties: 3UNH: 7
GLWUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GLW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GLW
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-291.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$48.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GLW
42.2% Overvalued
Price is 42.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $194.92
Fair Value: $137.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GLW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

+30.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +33.1%

The market implies +30.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +33.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GLW
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GLW
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GLW
Insiders 8.2%Institutions 73.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,760
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GLW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GLW
12
Sells (3M)
38
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $103.11M
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$18.65M
@ $186.46 · 2026-06-09
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$5.26M
@ $192.14 · 2026-05-22
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$3.92M
@ $195.93 · 2026-05-15
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$2.08M
@ $207.77 · 2026-05-13
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$4.12M
@ $206.23 · 2026-05-11
TILLMAN MICHAUNE D.
General Counsel
$674,870
@ $207.02 · 2026-05-11
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$1.98M
@ $198.34 · 2026-05-11
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$3.95M
@ $188.08 · 2026-05-08
GULLO MICHELLE L
Officer
$1.00M
@ $189.03 · 2026-05-08
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$5.44M
@ $196.06 · 2026-05-08
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $186.08 · 2026-05-07
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$2.77M
@ $184.67 · 2026-05-06
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$204,765
@ $133.75 · 2026-02-12
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$203,800
@ $128.74 · 2026-02-11
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.00M
@ $130.22 · 2026-02-10
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$812,722
@ $129.79 · 2026-02-09
KAMMERUD JORDANA DARYL
Officer
$3.83M
@ $127.67 · 2026-02-09
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$1.95M
@ $130.25 · 2026-02-09
FANG LI
Officer
$1.11M
@ $113.51 · 2026-02-04
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$558,232
@ $110.52 · 2026-02-02
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$2.75M
@ $110.00 · 2026-02-02
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.21M
@ $104.55 · 2026-01-29
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.50M
@ $90.78 · 2025-12-10
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.99M
@ $94.69 · 2025-12-10
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.91M
@ $91.25 · 2025-10-31
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.06M
@ $89.05 · 2025-10-31
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $91.28 · 2025-10-29
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$9.02M
@ $90.17 · 2025-10-29
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.37M
@ $77.18 · 2025-09-17
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.40M
@ $70.23 · 2025-09-04
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$79,425
@ $65.53 · 2025-08-12
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.23M
@ $65.31 · 2025-08-11
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.32M
@ $65.88 · 2025-08-07
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.35M
@ $65.19 · 2025-08-07
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$2.26M
@ $62.26 · 2025-07-30
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$927,912
@ $62.36 · 2025-07-30
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$877,013
@ $62.28 · 2025-07-30
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$1.04M
@ $62.22 · 2025-07-30
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.01M
@ $50.52 · 2025-06-11
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.02M
@ $51.11 · 2025-06-06
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$222,534
@ $49.85 · 2025-06-02
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$849,838
@ $49.68 · 2025-05-29
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$325,285
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-29
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$715,797
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-28
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$473,679
@ $49.29 · 2025-05-28
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$375,294
@ $46.91 · 2025-05-12
BELL MICHAEL ALAN
Retired
$892,768
@ $44.06 · 2025-04-30
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $50.08 · 2025-02-28
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$218,518
@ $52.82 · 2025-02-19
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$744,757
@ $52.78 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GLW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GLW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View GLW Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GLW vs UNH

Is Corning Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to GLW's -42.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $137 vs. $195).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Corning Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while GLW scores 36/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GLW scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Corning Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Corning Incorporated's 0.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Corning Incorporated or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 15.6% ROIC versus GLW's 9.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Corning Incorporated's or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to GLW's 63/100 (Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.