Compare StocksGLW vs INTC

Corning Incorporated (GLW) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

GLW
Corning Incorporated
$158.26
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

GLW
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.55 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.04 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
INTC

    Risks

    GLW
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 1.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 76.5x is 59% above the historical average of 48.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GLW
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.41B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    1.04%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    76.45
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    39.15
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    9.07%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    12.92%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    36.38%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    0.55
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.80
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.09
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    0.71%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    GLW: 6Ties: 2INTC: 2
    GLWINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GLW

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GLW
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-291.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$48.78B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GLW
    39.6% Overvalued
    Price is 39.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $158.26
    Fair Value: $113.37
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GLW

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $158?

    +28.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +30.2%

    The market implies +28.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +30.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GLW
    36/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GLW
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GLW
    Insiders 7.7%Institutions 71.0%Retail & Other 21.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,526
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GLW
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GLW
    7
    Sells (3M)
    34
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $54.06M
    ZHANG JOHN Z
    Officer
    $204,765
    @ $133.75 · 2026-02-12
    NELSON AVERY H III
    Chief Operating Officer
    $203,800
    @ $128.74 · 2026-02-11
    STEVERSON LEWIS A
    Officer
    $2.00M
    @ $130.22 · 2026-02-10
    NELSON AVERY H III
    Chief Operating Officer
    $812,722
    @ $129.79 · 2026-02-09
    KAMMERUD JORDANA DARYL
    Officer
    $3.83M
    @ $127.67 · 2026-02-09
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    Retired
    $1.95M
    @ $130.25 · 2026-02-09
    FANG LI
    Officer
    $1.11M
    @ $113.51 · 2026-02-04
    O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
    Officer
    $558,232
    @ $110.52 · 2026-02-02
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    Retired
    $2.75M
    @ $110.00 · 2026-02-02
    SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.21M
    @ $104.55 · 2026-01-29
    SEETHARAM SOUMYA
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $90.78 · 2025-12-10
    VERKLEEREN RONALD L
    Officer
    $1.99M
    @ $94.69 · 2025-12-10
    SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $91.25 · 2025-10-31
    STEVERSON LEWIS A
    Officer
    $2.06M
    @ $89.05 · 2025-10-31
    BECKER STEFAN
    Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $91.28 · 2025-10-29
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    Retired
    $9.02M
    @ $90.17 · 2025-10-29
    AMIN JAYMIN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $77.18 · 2025-09-17
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    President
    $1.40M
    @ $70.23 · 2025-09-04
    ZHANG JOHN Z
    Officer
    $79,425
    @ $65.53 · 2025-08-12
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    President
    $1.23M
    @ $65.31 · 2025-08-11
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    President
    $1.32M
    @ $65.88 · 2025-08-07
    WEEKS WENDELL P.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.35M
    @ $65.19 · 2025-08-07
    O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
    Officer
    $927,912
    @ $62.36 · 2025-07-30
    NELSON AVERY H III
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.26M
    @ $62.26 · 2025-07-30
    SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $877,013
    @ $62.28 · 2025-07-30
    STEVERSON LEWIS A
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $62.22 · 2025-07-30
    VERKLEEREN RONALD L
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $50.52 · 2025-06-11
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    President
    $1.02M
    @ $51.11 · 2025-06-06
    SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $222,534
    @ $49.85 · 2025-06-02
    SEETHARAM SOUMYA
    Chief Technology Officer
    $325,285
    @ $50.01 · 2025-05-29
    BECKER STEFAN
    Officer
    $849,838
    @ $49.68 · 2025-05-29
    SEETHARAM SOUMYA
    Chief Technology Officer
    $715,797
    @ $50.01 · 2025-05-28
    ZHANG JOHN Z
    Officer
    $473,679
    @ $49.29 · 2025-05-28
    ZHANG JOHN Z
    Officer
    $375,294
    @ $46.91 · 2025-05-12
    BELL MICHAEL ALAN
    Retired
    $892,768
    @ $44.06 · 2025-04-30
    WEEKS WENDELL P.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.01M
    @ $50.08 · 2025-02-28
    SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $218,518
    @ $52.82 · 2025-02-19
    ZHANG JOHN Z
    Officer
    $744,757
    @ $52.78 · 2025-02-18
    MUSSER ERIC S.
    President
    $1.56M
    @ $51.92 · 2025-01-31
    BELL MICHAEL ALAN
    Retired
    $110,165
    @ $49.87 · 2025-01-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GLW
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GLW
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View GLW Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    GLW vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io