Compare Stocks › GLW vs INTC

Corning Incorporated (GLW) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GLW is fairly valued at $123, with a DCF intrinsic value of $139 and a margin of safety of 11%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, GLW has the wider margin of safety.

GLW
Corning Incorporated
$123.31
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

GLW
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.71 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 4.04 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

GLW
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 1.3% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GLW
INTC
Valuation
$1.41B
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
1.33%
FCF Yield
0.19%
49.92
Trailing P/E
N/A
27.25
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
4.06%
17.88%
ROE
-9.62%
36.48%
Gross Margin
40.15%
0.71
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
0.46
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.49
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
0.91%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
GLW: 7Ties: 1INTC: 3
GLWINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GLW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GLW
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-291.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$48.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GLW
11.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $123.31
Fair Value: $138.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GLW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $123?

+24.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +26.7%

The market implies +24.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +26.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GLW
36/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GLW
-2.38
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GLW
Insiders 8.1%Institutions 74.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,126
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GLW
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GLW
2
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $76.66M
GULLO MICHELLE L
Officer
$1.50M
@ $152.29 · 2026-09-04
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$1.98M
@ $151.29 · 2026-08-28
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$18.65M
@ $186.46 · 2026-06-09
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$5.26M
@ $192.14 · 2026-05-22
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$3.92M
@ $195.93 · 2026-05-15
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$2.08M
@ $207.77 · 2026-05-13
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$1.98M
@ $198.34 · 2026-05-11
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$4.12M
@ $206.23 · 2026-05-11
TILLMAN MICHAUNE D.
General Counsel
$674,870
@ $207.02 · 2026-05-11
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$5.44M
@ $196.06 · 2026-05-08
GULLO MICHELLE L
Officer
$1.00M
@ $189.03 · 2026-05-08
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$3.95M
@ $188.08 · 2026-05-08
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $186.08 · 2026-05-07
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$2.77M
@ $184.67 · 2026-05-06
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$204,765
@ $133.75 · 2026-02-12
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$203,800
@ $128.74 · 2026-02-11
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.00M
@ $130.22 · 2026-02-10
KAMMERUD JORDANA DARYL
Officer
$3.83M
@ $127.67 · 2026-02-09
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$812,722
@ $129.79 · 2026-02-09
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$1.95M
@ $130.25 · 2026-02-09
FANG LI
Officer
$1.11M
@ $113.51 · 2026-02-04
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$558,232
@ $110.52 · 2026-02-02
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$2.75M
@ $110.00 · 2026-02-02
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.21M
@ $104.55 · 2026-01-29
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.99M
@ $94.69 · 2025-12-10
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$1.50M
@ $90.78 · 2025-12-10
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$1.91M
@ $91.25 · 2025-10-31
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$2.06M
@ $89.05 · 2025-10-31
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$1.10M
@ $91.28 · 2025-10-29
MUSSER ERIC S.
Retired
$9.02M
@ $90.17 · 2025-10-29
AMIN JAYMIN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.37M
@ $77.18 · 2025-09-17
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.40M
@ $70.23 · 2025-09-04
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$79,425
@ $65.53 · 2025-08-12
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.23M
@ $65.31 · 2025-08-11
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.35M
@ $65.19 · 2025-08-07
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.32M
@ $65.88 · 2025-08-07
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$877,013
@ $62.28 · 2025-07-30
STEVERSON LEWIS A
Officer
$1.04M
@ $62.22 · 2025-07-30
O'DAY MICHAEL PAUL
Officer
$927,912
@ $62.36 · 2025-07-30
NELSON AVERY H III
Chief Operating Officer
$2.26M
@ $62.26 · 2025-07-30
VERKLEEREN RONALD L
Officer
$1.01M
@ $50.52 · 2025-06-11
MUSSER ERIC S.
President
$1.02M
@ $51.11 · 2025-06-06
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$222,534
@ $49.85 · 2025-06-02
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$325,285
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-29
BECKER STEFAN
Officer
$849,838
@ $49.68 · 2025-05-29
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$473,679
@ $49.29 · 2025-05-28
SEETHARAM SOUMYA
Chief Technology Officer
$715,797
@ $50.01 · 2025-05-28
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$375,294
@ $46.91 · 2025-05-12
BELL MICHAEL ALAN
Retired
$892,768
@ $44.06 · 2025-04-30
WEEKS WENDELL P.
Chief Executive Officer
$5.01M
@ $50.08 · 2025-02-28
SCHLESINGER EDWARD A
Chief Financial Officer
$218,518
@ $52.82 · 2025-02-19
ZHANG JOHN Z
Officer
$744,757
@ $52.78 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GLW
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GLW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View GLW Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GLW vs INTC

Is Corning Incorporated or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GLW trades at a 11.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $139 vs. price $123), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Corning Incorporated or Intel Corporation?▼

GLW scores 36/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GLW scores 4.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Corning Incorporated or Intel Corporation?▼

Corning Incorporated (GLW) generates a 1.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Corning Incorporated or Intel Corporation?▼

GLW earns 11.3% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

GLW vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io