Compare StocksGL vs MSFT

Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)

GL
Globe Life Inc.
$137.71
VS
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$389.02

Rewards

GL
  • Share count has been reduced by 18% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • FCF yield of 10.4% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
MSFT
  • Microsoft Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 68.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Microsoft Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GL
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 8 insider sales totaling $13.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
MSFT
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GL
MSFT
Valuation
$1.14B
Free Cash Flow
$71.61B
10.37%
FCF Yield
2.48%
9.79
Trailing P/E
24.33
8.33
Forward P/E
20.64
Quality & Moat
12.70%
ROIC
22.10%
19.44%
ROE
26.05%
33.81%
Gross Margin
68.59%
1.03
PEG Ratio
0.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.51
Debt / Equity
0.32
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.60
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.19
0.96%
Dividend Yield
0.94%
GL: 3Ties: 2MSFT: 7
GLMSFT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

MSFT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GL
$-0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.95B
Δ Market Cap
$-600.0M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MSFT
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$196.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.81T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GL
49.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 49.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $137.71
Fair Value: $272.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MSFT
0.5% Overvalued
Price is 0.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $389.02
Fair Value: $387.10
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $138?

+0.6%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

MSFT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $389?

+12.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.4%

The market implies +12.6% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +17.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GL
39/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MSFT
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MSFT
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 85.6%Retail & Other 13.7%
No. of Institutional Holders937
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MSFT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.0%Retail & Other 23.9%
No. of Institutional Holders8,055
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
THIGPEN MARY E
Director
$270,600
@ $90.20 · 2024-07-26
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$205,421
@ $82.17 · 2024-05-28
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$205,684
@ $82.27 · 2024-05-21
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$82,775
@ $82.78 · 2024-05-21
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$215,764
@ $86.31 · 2024-05-20
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$42,214
@ $84.43 · 2024-05-17
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$169,646
@ $84.82 · 2024-05-16
BLINN MARK A
Director
$153,540
@ $76.77 · 2024-04-25
BLINN MARK A
Director
$153,540
@ $76.77 · 2024-04-25
RODRIGUEZ DAVID A.
Director
$119,585
@ $79.72 · 2024-04-24
JOHNSON STEVEN PAUL
Director
$100,800
@ $76.42 · 2024-04-24
BRANNEN JAMES PATRICK
Director
$156,940
@ $78.47 · 2024-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MSFT
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.44M
STANTON JOHN W.
Director
$1.99M
@ $397.35 · 2026-02-18
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.45M
@ $377.47 · 2025-04-23
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GL
8
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $48.11M
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$372,620
@ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$1.38M
@ $144.34 · 2026-02-27
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.53M
@ $145.29 · 2026-02-27
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$101,524
@ $142.59 · 2026-02-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.81M
@ $144.78 · 2026-02-17
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.43M
@ $143.14 · 2026-02-12
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$4.41M
@ $146.89 · 2026-02-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.32M
@ $140.43 · 2025-12-16
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$426,341
@ $139.10 · 2025-12-12
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$12.22M
@ $134.28 · 2025-10-24
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$641,340
@ $142.52 · 2025-09-12
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$695,537
@ $139.83 · 2025-09-10
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $137.41 · 2025-08-01
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.54M
@ $141.58 · 2025-07-31
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.08M
@ $140.97 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.59 · 2025-07-25
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$2.03M
@ $135.58 · 2025-07-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$733,617
@ $121.24 · 2025-06-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$737,385
@ $122.51 · 2025-05-20
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.09 · 2025-05-12
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$347,641
@ $126.41 · 2025-03-19
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Technology Officer
$200,952
@ $124.81 · 2025-03-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $122.42 · 2025-02-14
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $121.52 · 2025-02-11
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $121.44 · 2025-02-11
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$3.66M
@ $121.90 · 2025-02-07
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.91 · 2025-01-06
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.92 · 2025-01-06
BLINN MARK A
Director
$339,705
@ $113.23 · 2025-01-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $112.56 · 2025-01-06
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$168,487
@ $112.32 · 2025-01-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.56M
@ $108.80 · 2024-12-03
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$878,755
@ $109.84 · 2024-11-07
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$179,336
@ $77.30 · 2024-04-25
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MSFT
1
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $172.43M
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$5.05M
@ $409.55 · 2026-03-06
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.36M
@ $478.72 · 2025-12-04
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$6.27M
@ $491.52 · 2025-12-02
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$19.97M
@ $518.64 · 2025-11-03
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$75.32M
@ $504.78 · 2025-09-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$2.56M
@ $527.32 · 2025-08-12
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.39M
@ $463.00 · 2025-06-03
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$460,008
@ $460.01 · 2025-05-30
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$9.76M
@ $453.77 · 2025-05-21
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$7.33M
@ $458.18 · 2025-05-19
COLEMAN AMY
Officer
$5.99M
@ $452.04 · 2025-05-15
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$1.68M
@ $438.44 · 2025-05-05
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$35.30M
@ $435.84 · 2025-05-05
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.12M
@ $447.41 · 2024-12-09
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$874,634
@ $437.32 · 2024-12-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.50M
@ $428.76 · 2024-12-02
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.43M
@ $417.00 · 2024-11-22
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$414,720
@ $414.72 · 2024-11-22
YOUNG CHRISTOPHER DAVID
Officer
$3.05M
@ $423.66 · 2024-11-12
HOGAN KATHLEEN T
Officer
$7.16M
@ $411.86 · 2024-09-10
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$1.03M
@ $411.04 · 2024-09-10
SMITH BRADFORD LEE
President
$16.10M
@ $402.59 · 2024-09-09
HOOD AMY E
Chief Financial Officer
$15.60M
@ $410.55 · 2024-09-05
NADELLA SATYA
Chief Executive Officer
$32.02M
@ $408.63 · 2024-09-04
NUMOTO TAKESHI
Officer
$235,535
@ $416.14 · 2024-06-03
ALTHOFF JUDSON
Officer
$10.64M
@ $425.68 · 2024-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MSFT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
MSFT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View GL Full AnalysisView MSFT Full Analysis
Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io