Compare StocksGL vs MS

Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GL is undervalued at $171, with a DCF intrinsic value of $300 and a margin of safety of 43%. MS is undervalued at $223, with an intrinsic value of $298 and a margin of safety of 25%. Of the two, GL has the wider margin of safety.

GL
Globe Life Inc.
$170.76
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$223.17

Rewards

GL
  • Globe Life Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 18% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

GL
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 13 insider sales totaling $29.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 75/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.
MS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.2x is 26% above the historical average of 16.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.66 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GL
MS
Valuation
$1.32B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
9.93%
FCF Yield
N/A
11.82
Trailing P/E
20.21
10.26
Forward P/E
17.56
Quality & Moat
12.19%
ROIC
3.38%
20.46%
ROE
16.39%
33.73%
Gross Margin
87.39%
1.30
PEG Ratio
2.66
Balance Sheet Safety
0.46
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.72
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.78%
Dividend Yield
1.81%
GL: 5Ties: 1MS: 3
GLMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GL
$-0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.95B
Δ Market Cap
$-600.0M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GL
43.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $170.76
Fair Value: $300.45
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
25.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 25.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $223.17
Fair Value: $297.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $171?

+0.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GL
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 86.6%Retail & Other 12.8%
No. of Institutional Holders937
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.3%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,208
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GL
13
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $77.10M
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.32M
@ $165.78 · 2026-06-12
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $156.68 · 2026-05-22
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.24M
@ $156.59 · 2026-05-22
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.86M
@ $156.61 · 2026-05-19
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $152.95 · 2026-05-11
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$333,656
@ $155.19 · 2026-05-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.30M
@ $153.59 · 2026-05-05
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.39M
@ $153.85 · 2026-05-05
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $153.75 · 2026-05-01
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$717,530
@ $153.88 · 2026-04-28
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$5.23M
@ $153.81 · 2026-04-24
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$555,168
@ $154.60 · 2026-04-24
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.20M
@ $136.61 · 2026-03-31
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$372,620
@ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.53M
@ $145.29 · 2026-02-27
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$1.38M
@ $144.34 · 2026-02-27
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$101,524
@ $142.59 · 2026-02-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.81M
@ $144.78 · 2026-02-17
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.43M
@ $143.14 · 2026-02-12
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$4.41M
@ $146.89 · 2026-02-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.32M
@ $140.43 · 2025-12-16
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$426,341
@ $139.10 · 2025-12-12
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$12.22M
@ $134.28 · 2025-10-24
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$641,340
@ $142.52 · 2025-09-12
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$695,537
@ $139.83 · 2025-09-10
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $137.41 · 2025-08-01
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.54M
@ $141.58 · 2025-07-31
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.08M
@ $140.97 · 2025-07-29
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.59 · 2025-07-25
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$2.03M
@ $135.58 · 2025-07-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$733,617
@ $121.24 · 2025-06-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$737,385
@ $122.51 · 2025-05-20
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.09 · 2025-05-12
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$347,641
@ $126.41 · 2025-03-19
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Technology Officer
$200,952
@ $124.81 · 2025-03-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $122.42 · 2025-02-14
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $121.44 · 2025-02-11
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $121.52 · 2025-02-11
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$3.66M
@ $121.90 · 2025-02-07
BLINN MARK A
Director
$339,705
@ $113.23 · 2025-01-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.51M
@ $112.56 · 2025-01-06
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$168,487
@ $112.32 · 2025-01-06
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.91 · 2025-01-06
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.92 · 2025-01-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
4
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $70.42M
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$368,375
@ $105.25 · 2024-07-26
AKRAM RAJA
Officer
$797,764
@ $106.37 · 2024-07-18
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$106,621
@ $106.62 · 2024-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.26M
@ $106.54 · 2024-07-17
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GL
FearGreed
😏Greed(75/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View GL Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GL vs MS

Is Globe Life Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GL trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $300 vs. price $171), compared to MS's 25.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $298 vs. $223).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Globe Life Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

GL scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GL scores 0.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Globe Life Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

GL earns 12.2% ROIC versus MS's 3.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Globe Life Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

GL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). GL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.