Compare Stocks › GL vs MA

Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, GL is overvalued at $159, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. MA is overvalued at $638, with an intrinsic value of $563 and a margin of safety of -13%. Of the two, MA has the wider margin of safety.

GL
Globe Life Inc.
$159.08
VS
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$638.01

Rewards

GL
  • ★Globe Life Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 18% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
MA
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 100.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Mastercard Incorporated scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

GL
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
MA
  • ⚠FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠High leverage (2.00x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • ⚠9 insider sales totaling $24.1M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GL
MA
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$16.63B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.99%
10.65
Trailing P/E
33.39
9.71
Forward P/E
27.58
Quality & Moat
15.53%
ROIC
56.56%
18.86%
ROE
231.37%
33.10%
Gross Margin
100.00%
1.30
PEG Ratio
1.66
Balance Sheet Safety
0.48
Net Debt / Equity
2.00
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.80
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.59
0.83%
Dividend Yield
0.55%
GL: 5Ties: 1MA: 4
GLMA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GL
$-0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.95B
Δ Market Cap
$-600.0M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MA
$5.62
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$31.68B
Δ Market Cap
+$177.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GL
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $159.08
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MA
13.3% Overvalued
Price is 13.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $638.01
Fair Value: $562.90
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

MA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $638?

+16.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.0%

The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +15.0%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GL
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MA
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MA
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 89.8%Retail & Other 9.5%
No. of Institutional Holders973
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MA
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,838
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GL
2
Sells (3M)
35
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $78.33M
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$2.22M
@ $154.48 · 2026-10-23
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$1.70M
@ $170.07 · 2026-09-22
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$9.12M
@ $182.43 · 2026-07-31
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$3.78M
@ $180.06 · 2026-07-30
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$6.61M
@ $178.64 · 2026-07-29
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.58M
@ $178.58 · 2026-07-28
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$331,483
@ $179.18 · 2026-06-30
ALSTON CHERYL D
Director
$1.48M
@ $179.24 · 2026-06-25
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$340,193
@ $170.10 · 2026-06-18
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.32M
@ $165.78 · 2026-06-12
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$693,794
@ $166.18 · 2026-06-12
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $156.68 · 2026-05-22
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.24M
@ $156.59 · 2026-05-22
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.86M
@ $156.61 · 2026-05-19
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $152.95 · 2026-05-11
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$333,656
@ $155.19 · 2026-05-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.30M
@ $153.59 · 2026-05-05
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.39M
@ $153.85 · 2026-05-05
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $153.75 · 2026-05-01
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$717,530
@ $153.88 · 2026-04-28
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$5.23M
@ $153.81 · 2026-04-24
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$555,168
@ $154.60 · 2026-04-24
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.20M
@ $136.61 · 2026-03-31
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$372,620
@ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$372,620
@ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$1.38M
@ $144.34 · 2026-02-27
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.53M
@ $145.29 · 2026-02-27
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$101,524
@ $142.59 · 2026-02-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.81M
@ $144.78 · 2026-02-17
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.43M
@ $143.14 · 2026-02-12
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$4.41M
@ $146.89 · 2026-02-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.32M
@ $140.43 · 2025-12-16
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$426,341
@ $139.10 · 2025-12-12
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$12.22M
@ $134.28 · 2025-10-24
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$641,340
@ $142.52 · 2025-09-12
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$695,537
@ $139.83 · 2025-09-10
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $137.41 · 2025-08-01
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.54M
@ $141.58 · 2025-07-31
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.08M
@ $140.97 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.59 · 2025-07-25
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$2.03M
@ $135.58 · 2025-07-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$733,617
@ $121.24 · 2025-06-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$737,385
@ $122.51 · 2025-05-20
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.09 · 2025-05-12
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$347,641
@ $126.41 · 2025-03-19
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Technology Officer
$200,952
@ $124.81 · 2025-03-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $122.42 · 2025-02-14
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $121.44 · 2025-02-11
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $121.52 · 2025-02-11
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$3.66M
@ $121.90 · 2025-02-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MA
9
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.73M
LING HAI
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $620.00 · 2026-10-16
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$435,418
@ $587.61 · 2026-10-12
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.91M
@ $584.00 · 2026-09-02
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$547,837
@ $593.54 · 2026-08-31
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$4.87M
@ $576.53 · 2026-08-20
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$673,201
@ $565.24 · 2026-08-17
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.84M
@ $575.00 · 2026-08-05
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Officer
$1.72M
@ $571.87 · 2026-08-05
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$2.44M
@ $570.31 · 2026-08-04
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$19.08M
@ $573.84 · 2026-08-03
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$185,760
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-15
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$10.59M
@ $534.87 · 2026-07-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$216,000
@ $540.00 · 2026-07-07
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$3.58M
@ $526.37 · 2026-07-02
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$7.49M
@ $525.19 · 2026-07-01
LING HAI
Officer
$4.48M
@ $499.20 · 2026-02-24
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.20M
@ $591.00 · 2025-09-02
LING HAI
Officer
$2.69M
@ $600.00 · 2025-08-22
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$10.46M
@ $586.89 · 2025-08-19
SACHIN J. MEHRA
Chief Financial Officer
$3.83M
@ $566.46 · 2025-08-05
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$178,049
@ $570.67 · 2025-07-07
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-30
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$601,447
@ $546.77 · 2025-06-27
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$536,480
@ $560.00 · 2025-06-24
GENACHOWSKI JULIUS
Director
$173,910
@ $561.00 · 2025-06-24
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.02M
@ $532.97 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$508,474
@ $535.80 · 2025-06-20
SESHADRI RAJEEV
Officer
$1.76M
@ $561.78 · 2025-06-16
KIRKPATRICK LINDA PISTECCHIA
Officer
$549,373
@ $572.86 · 2025-06-13
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$5.55M
@ $588.18 · 2025-06-12
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$8.22M
@ $585.05 · 2025-06-05
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$218,223
@ $577.31 · 2025-05-15
ARKELL SANDRA A
Officer
$257,535
@ $572.30 · 2025-05-12
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$8.68M
@ $550.16 · 2025-03-26
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$3.81M
@ $534.68 · 2025-03-19
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.12M
@ $556.14 · 2025-03-05
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$9.78M
@ $553.76 · 2025-03-05
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$6.19M
@ $562.72 · 2025-02-26
VOSBURG CRAIG
Officer
$7.97M
@ $565.00 · 2025-02-18
MIEBACH MICHAEL
Chief Executive Officer
$10.17M
@ $564.95 · 2025-02-18
MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD GRUNDE
Officer
$6.18M
@ $564.99 · 2025-02-18
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MA
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GL
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
MA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View GL Full AnalysisView MA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GL vs MA

Is Globe Life Inc. or Mastercard Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MA trades at a -13.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $563 vs. price $638), compared to GL's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $159).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Globe Life Inc. or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

MA scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while GL scores 97/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Globe Life Inc. in financial distress?▼

GL's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MA scores 10.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Globe Life Inc. or Mastercard Incorporated?▼

MA earns 56.6% ROIC versus GL's 15.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Globe Life Inc.'s or Mastercard Incorporated's?▼

MA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GL's 94/100 (Very Safe). MA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

GL vs MA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io