Compare StocksGL vs INTU

Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, GL is overvalued at $182, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTU is undervalued at $316, with an intrinsic value of $536 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

GL
Globe Life Inc.
$182.25
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$316.07

Rewards

GL
  • Globe Life Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 18% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

GL
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $16.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
INTU
  • FCF yield of 6.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
GL
INTU
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$5.23B
N/A
FCF Yield
6.05%
12.12
Trailing P/E
19.27
11.03
Forward P/E
11.56
Quality & Moat
12.79%
ROIC
28.21%
19.09%
ROE
22.50%
33.91%
Gross Margin
80.79%
1.30
PEG Ratio
0.82
Balance Sheet Safety
0.46
Net Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.67
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.02
0.72%
Dividend Yield
1.52%
GL: 1Ties: 2INTU: 7
GLINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
GL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
GL
$-0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.95B
Δ Market Cap
$-600.0M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
GL
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $182.25
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
41.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $316.07
Fair Value: $536.01
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
GL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $316?

+7.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.1%

The market implies +7.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
GL
97/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
GL
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
GL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 86.7%Retail & Other 12.6%
No. of Institutional Holders958
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 6.0%
No. of Institutional Holders2,638
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
GL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
GL
10
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $63.50M
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$331,483
@ $179.18 · 2026-06-30
ALSTON CHERYL D
Director
$1.48M
@ $179.24 · 2026-06-25
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$340,193
@ $170.10 · 2026-06-18
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$693,794
@ $166.18 · 2026-06-12
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.32M
@ $165.78 · 2026-06-12
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.24M
@ $156.59 · 2026-05-22
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $156.68 · 2026-05-22
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$1.86M
@ $156.61 · 2026-05-19
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.20M
@ $152.95 · 2026-05-11
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$333,656
@ $155.19 · 2026-05-06
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.39M
@ $153.85 · 2026-05-05
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.30M
@ $153.59 · 2026-05-05
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.54M
@ $153.75 · 2026-05-01
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$717,530
@ $153.88 · 2026-04-28
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$555,168
@ $154.60 · 2026-04-24
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$5.23M
@ $153.81 · 2026-04-24
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.20M
@ $136.61 · 2026-03-31
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$372,620
@ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.53M
@ $145.29 · 2026-02-27
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$1.38M
@ $144.34 · 2026-02-27
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Investment Officer
$101,524
@ $142.59 · 2026-02-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.81M
@ $144.78 · 2026-02-17
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.43M
@ $143.14 · 2026-02-12
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$4.41M
@ $146.89 · 2026-02-06
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.32M
@ $140.43 · 2025-12-16
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$426,341
@ $139.10 · 2025-12-12
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$12.22M
@ $134.28 · 2025-10-24
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$641,340
@ $142.52 · 2025-09-12
SKARJUNE DOLORES L
Officer
$695,537
@ $139.83 · 2025-09-10
MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
Officer
$1.37M
@ $137.41 · 2025-08-01
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.54M
@ $141.58 · 2025-07-31
KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
Chief Financial Officer
$4.08M
@ $140.97 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$454,196
@ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$2.03M
@ $135.58 · 2025-07-25
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.59 · 2025-07-25
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$733,617
@ $121.24 · 2025-06-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$737,385
@ $122.51 · 2025-05-20
ZORN REBECCA E
Officer
$1.21M
@ $121.09 · 2025-05-12
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$347,641
@ $126.41 · 2025-03-19
HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
Chief Technology Officer
$200,952
@ $124.81 · 2025-03-04
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$2.66M
@ $122.42 · 2025-02-14
DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $121.52 · 2025-02-11
SVOBODA FRANK M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.34M
@ $121.44 · 2025-02-11
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$1.30M
@ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
General Counsel
$3.66M
@ $121.90 · 2025-02-07
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.91 · 2025-01-06
HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $112.92 · 2025-01-06
HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
Officer
$168,487
@ $112.32 · 2025-01-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
3
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.62M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$74,499
@ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
GL
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
GL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
View GL Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: GL vs INTU

Is Globe Life Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 41.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $536 vs. price $316), compared to GL's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $182).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Globe Life Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

GL scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Globe Life Inc. in financial distress?

GL's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTU scores 8.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Globe Life Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus GL's 12.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Globe Life Inc.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?

INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GL's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.