Compare StocksGL vs INTC

Globe Life Inc. (GL) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, GL is undervalued at $171, with a DCF intrinsic value of $300 and a margin of safety of 43%. INTC is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -1513%. Of the two, GL has the wider margin of safety.

GL
Globe Life Inc.
$170.76
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$133.99

Rewards

GL
  • Globe Life Inc. scores 97/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 18% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
INTC

    Risks

    GL
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.85 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 13 insider sales totaling $29.0M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    • Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 75/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Insiders have sold $6.5M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    GL
    INTC
    Valuation
    $1.32B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    9.93%
    FCF Yield
    -1.23%
    11.82
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    10.26
    Forward P/E
    86.70
    Quality & Moat
    12.19%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    20.46%
    ROE
    -2.91%
    33.73%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.30
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.46
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.10
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.72
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    0.78%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    GL: 6Ties: 2INTC: 3
    GLINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    GL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    GL
    $-0.20
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.95B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-600.0M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    GL
    43.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $170.76
    Fair Value: $300.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $133.99
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    GL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $171?

    +0.9%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market roughly matching historical growth — reasonable.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    GL
    97/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    GL
    -2.46
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    GL
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 86.6%Retail & Other 12.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders937
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 64.0%Retail & Other 21.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,349
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    GL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    GL
    13
    Sells (3M)
    34
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $77.10M
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.32M
    @ $165.78 · 2026-06-12
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $156.68 · 2026-05-22
    KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $156.59 · 2026-05-22
    KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.86M
    @ $156.61 · 2026-05-19
    KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.20M
    @ $152.95 · 2026-05-11
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $333,656
    @ $155.19 · 2026-05-06
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.30M
    @ $153.59 · 2026-05-05
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.39M
    @ $153.85 · 2026-05-05
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.54M
    @ $153.75 · 2026-05-01
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $717,530
    @ $153.88 · 2026-04-28
    MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
    Officer
    $5.23M
    @ $153.81 · 2026-04-24
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $555,168
    @ $154.60 · 2026-04-24
    ZORN REBECCA E
    Officer
    $1.20M
    @ $136.61 · 2026-03-31
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.66M
    @ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.66M
    @ $145.10 · 2026-03-04
    HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
    Chief Investment Officer
    $372,620
    @ $145.04 · 2026-03-02
    HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $145.29 · 2026-02-27
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $144.34 · 2026-02-27
    HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
    Chief Investment Officer
    $101,524
    @ $142.59 · 2026-02-25
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $144.78 · 2026-02-17
    HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
    Officer
    $1.43M
    @ $143.14 · 2026-02-12
    MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
    Officer
    $4.41M
    @ $146.89 · 2026-02-06
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.32M
    @ $140.43 · 2025-12-16
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $426,341
    @ $139.10 · 2025-12-12
    MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
    General Counsel
    $12.22M
    @ $134.28 · 2025-10-24
    SKARJUNE DOLORES L
    Officer
    $641,340
    @ $142.52 · 2025-09-12
    SKARJUNE DOLORES L
    Officer
    $695,537
    @ $139.83 · 2025-09-10
    MAJORS MICHAEL CLAY
    Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $137.41 · 2025-08-01
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.54M
    @ $141.58 · 2025-07-31
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $454,196
    @ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $454,196
    @ $139.75 · 2025-07-29
    KALMBACH THOMAS PETER
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.08M
    @ $140.97 · 2025-07-29
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.51M
    @ $135.59 · 2025-07-25
    ZORN REBECCA E
    Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $135.58 · 2025-07-25
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $733,617
    @ $121.24 · 2025-06-04
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $737,385
    @ $122.51 · 2025-05-20
    ZORN REBECCA E
    Officer
    $1.21M
    @ $121.09 · 2025-05-12
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $347,641
    @ $126.41 · 2025-03-19
    HENSLEY ROBERT EDWARD
    Chief Technology Officer
    $200,952
    @ $124.81 · 2025-03-04
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.66M
    @ $122.42 · 2025-02-14
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.34M
    @ $121.44 · 2025-02-11
    DARDEN JAMES MATTHEW
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $121.52 · 2025-02-11
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $1.30M
    @ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $1.30M
    @ $122.31 · 2025-02-07
    MITCHELL ROBERT BRIAN
    General Counsel
    $3.66M
    @ $121.90 · 2025-02-07
    BLINN MARK A
    Director
    $339,705
    @ $113.23 · 2025-01-06
    SVOBODA FRANK M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $112.56 · 2025-01-06
    HENRIE MICHAEL SHANE
    Officer
    $168,487
    @ $112.32 · 2025-01-06
    HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $112.91 · 2025-01-06
    HAWORTH JENNIFER ALLISON
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $112.92 · 2025-01-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    2
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    GL
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(75/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(65/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    GL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
    View GL Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: GL vs INTC

    Is Globe Life Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, GL trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $300 vs. price $171), compared to INTC's -1512.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $134).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Globe Life Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    GL scores 97/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Globe Life Inc. in financial distress?

    GL's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Globe Life Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    Globe Life Inc. (GL) generates a 9.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's -1.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Globe Life Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    GL earns 12.2% ROIC versus INTC's 1.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.